No Avatar image uploaded
Chelsea Rumours Member Posts
TomB's Profile
No Avatar image uploaded
TomB's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To TomB's Posts
To TomB's last 5 rumours posts
To TomB's last 5 rumour replies
To TomB's last 5 banter replies
TomB's rumours posts with other poster's replies to TomB's rumours posts
06 Feb 2025 11:18:13
A mate has just told me the Chelsea and Mudryk have received verbal notification that the "B" sample has returned negative. He there will be no announcement from the club until they receive written notification.
I personally think my mate has picked up an old rumour but hey ho!
1.) 06 Feb 2025 16:50:59
It would be wonderful if this rumour was true if only especially for the player himself. But it would a pretty rare example of a B sample being negative I think.
2.) 06 Feb 2025 18:31:39
The B sample is seldom different. Also, the results of the B sample are usually known within a week of the A sample. The Mudryck story simply disappeared.
3.) 06 Feb 2025 18:33:13
JBS, spot on and hence my doubts about it being true. I’m not sure if there is a thing as “marginal” in a drugs test but I think that is the more likely situation.
4.) 06 Feb 2025 18:33:28
"Mudryk’s B Sample is expected back in January and, if positive, the Ukrainian could face a four-year ban"
Well January is over and still no news. Very strange.
5.) 06 Feb 2025 21:48:11
This rumour apparently started few days ago on twitter / X and wasn’t by a journalist, someone just starting rumours, more so for MM I hope he gets back playing soon.
6.) 07 Feb 2025 16:52:40
Strange that Mudryk is still in the Conference squad. I suppose there could be a rule that makes it pointless to take him out.
7.) 10 Feb 2025 14:46:25
The odd normal half reliable sources have also picked this up, no idea if it is true.
But it is undeniably strange that it is taking so long, I did read an article that if is B sample was negative and the A sample was positive due to cross contamination in the testing this would open a huge can of worms and invalidate previous tests no idea if this is true
Apparently B samples that are negative are in the 3-5% range
Also strange that the story has gone so quiet.
02 Feb 2025 22:16:16
Apparently Chilly having a medical at Palace tomorrow. Good luck to the lad.
I assume Gusto will now be cover for Cucarella.
1.) 03 Feb 2025 09:14:57
Yes presumably Gusto now the cover for both Cucarella and James. With Veiga shipped out there is no other left back cover for MC? We are looking a bit thin in both defence and midfield now?
2.) 03 Feb 2025 09:59:46
Agree Tom regarding Chilly however isn't Gusto a permanent cover for Reece?
3.) 03 Feb 2025 10:42:32
He can play both sides.
4.) 03 Feb 2025 12:44:52
Ishe Samuels-Smith is also on the fringes. He's very good.
5.) 03 Feb 2025 13:17:50
Trouble is Tom most of the time he will be covering for Reece, hope I'm wrong though.
27 Jan 2025 21:41:53
I wonder if we are one of the supposed ten plus clubs interested in taking Ferguson on loan?
1.) 28 Jan 2025 10:02:01
We seemed to be linked to almost everyonme rumoured to be potentially moving this January.
2.) 28 Jan 2025 11:23:47
Dry loan makes sense for us, could see Jackson play on the left a bit too, has Ferguson been injured a lot this season or just not been in manager’s plans?
3.) 28 Jan 2025 14:55:14
Matt, yes he has missed games through injury and my guess is he will go to a club with guaranteed game time.
He started against us a while ago and totally destroyed us at the back before going off with an injury.
26 Jan 2025 15:04:29
I love the debate/ banter on this site but I have just finished having a very long discussion with a fellow season ticket holder who says we may well still sign Tel from BM.
Clips always show the positive side of a player but I would be astonished if BM let this lad leave.
1.) 26 Jan 2025 17:38:44
Agreed Tom however I suppose it depends on how much they want Nukunku.
2.) 27 Jan 2025 09:57:14
I understand that Nkunku wants to leave and the club want him gone, but at some point the powers that be need to prioritise improving the first team rather than continuing on the path of speculative purchases.
Tel is fantastic talent but we need to have conversation about whether these young players are being set up to fail at Chelsea, by joining a team that is in a constant state of flux, with no success now for approaching 3 years.
The SDs need to accept that they can't hoover up every highly rated u23 player in world football. They are going to miss out on some players, that is ok.
My final point would be what does this say about their judgement of players they have purchased for the wide roles? 60m Mudryk, 60m Neto, 65m Felix, 27m Madueke, 25m Sancho. None of them, perhaps bar Madueke who is frustrating in his own right, have delivered. Food for thought.
3.) 27 Jan 2025 10:34:50
RBD, just a few points. The pressure should always be on the SD’s to deliver players who can bring success/ trophies to the club. I also have no idea who has or is setting the agenda for the signing of young talent. As far as I know they could be acting under the instructions of the board/ owners.
I think Sancho is proving my initial concerns to be misplaced.
From everything that I have read the club do not want Nkunku to leave. I think if he leaves it could well be that the player wants to.
4.) 27 Jan 2025 12:40:19
Tom, its great to be back and chatting Chels with you.
I admit I have no smoking gun to use as proof, but the actions of the SDs so far have suggested that they see any player signed before their time as surplus to requirements. Nkunku was signed prior to them coming on board and was by all accounts a signing driven by Vivell, who has since left the club. We can also reasonably assume that his wage is considered too high by the club, due to the numerous briefs released about bringing wages down at the club. I think it is therefore likely that they would very much prefer to move on Nkunku, not to mention that unlike the vast majority of the squad, he seems to actually be in demand.
As for him pushing to leave - can you blame him? He was given the first game of the season to play in his preferred role, and since then has been shoehorned in as a 9, limited to appearances when we are chasing a game.
I am in agreement that Sancho appears to be an astute signing, but I am basing that entirely on his price. He has certainly not brought dynamic wing play to the Bridge and his output in terms of goals and assists is paltry. Of all the players I listed, none have been a dramatic improvement on CHO, which for circa £230m is extremely disappointing.
5.) 27 Jan 2025 14:14:38
RBD, I’m can’t be bothered to look for a “smoking gun” but I am happy to make guesses and probably come up with the wrong conclusion.
I have said so many times I have no problems with players wanting to leave and if the reason is they believe they are being treated unfairly it’s seems perfectly reasonable to me that they move to another club. As I’ve said it would appear to me it’s Nkunku who may want to leave not club wanting him to leave, that would hardly suggest that his wages are an issue for the club.
I repeat I have no idea what job the SD’s have been asked to do at Chelsea but like all SD’s involved in recruitment at any club, if they get it wrong then they deserve criticism.
The winger question is interesting. I’ve stated that every day of the week and twice on Sundays I would have signed Neto, sadly he hasn’t hit the ground running and against Fulham him and Gusto were a disaster. He might well play better with James behind him. Noni is a mystery to me. He seem to have some questions to answer about his professionalism but I find myself swinging from fantastic to woeful. Mudryk was just showing a glimmer of ability and then the wheels fall off, maybe if his own making and that will be very sad. Sancho for me has a touch of class. He is always willing to receive the ball in tight situations and although he prefers to move inside with the ball he can go both ways. If I was looking to sell any of them and putting aside Mudryk it would be Noni if only because it would partially stop me swearing at the TV.
6.) 27 Jan 2025 17:18:28
I think Sanch has shown quick feet and some good passing but will hopefully push on into backing himself to ghet into the box more and shoot and hopefully score more.
7.) 27 Jan 2025 18:30:52
Tom, my hope for quality wing play died when we somehow deigned not to sign Olise. No matter what the reason, it was a complete slam dunk of a signing and would have set us up for 5 years at a minimum.
I full expect Noni will be sent to the bomb squad - another Vivell signing and he's in the way of the SDs latest pet project Estevao. As for Neto, after fudging said Olise transfer it's clear they did a deal with the devil Mendes and thought they just needed to get someone in through the door. I wasn't impressed with the player, the circumstances, the treatment of Gallagher and Samu, and especially that he came as a package deal with Felix.
How are they going to be able to break even on some of these players, let alone profit is beyond me. There are two fairly predictable outcomes, lots of loans (Veiga, Disasi, Sterling) or sales of anyone they can (Nkunku, Gallagher) . My fear is that the latter will eventually extend to Palmer, Colwill, Jackson, Santos etc.
8.) 27 Jan 2025 20:02:38
RBD, what does “designed” it for that matter “slam dunk” mean in the context of Olise? As far as I know we didn’t make a bid for the player.
There is nothing clear about making some sort of deal with a “devil” agent as you suggest. This just all made up stuff but then we all just fans just guessing.
I would have liked CG to stay. He was offered a contract (according to Ed002) and turned it down. He was obviously entitled to turn it down. From what I can remember, I think from Ed001, the manager didn’t want Felix (neither did I) but the SD’s did.
If they don’t sell a player then “breaking even, ” making a loss or making a profit isn’t an issue. The loan deal for Veiga looks like a no brainer and I haven’t got a clue is Disasi will be a loan or a sale but there are apparently several clubs interested. I personally hope he is sold.
Sterling, was a strange episode but I think the club just ran out of road having decided very late in the last window he wasn’t part of there plans. I was hoping he might do reasonably well for the gooners so as to create some interest but as yet that hasn’t happened.
Your comment about Palmer, Santos, Colwill, Jackson being sold at some stage is in my opinion reasonable. In fact there was a rumour of an offer of £160m for Palmer and I asked the question from fellow posters, would they take that offer. If I remember correctly only one person said No but then only person said Yes and that was me. I gave up feeling precious about any player a long time ago.
9.) 28 Jan 2025 08:48:07
We tapped up Olise for over year, and then didn't sign him. He was clearly one of the best wingers in the league, moved for less money than we spent on Neto, and has been brilliant for Bayern.
We can read between the lines.
10.) 28 Jan 2025 09:49:48
The trouble is that all of this is exposing the apparent lack of careful planning and cool considered minds behind Vision 2023.
It is quite possible that Gallagher a) was offered a not v good contract; or b) it was a reasonable contract but with Poch departing he fekt his game time going forward was in jeaopardy in terms of SD antipathy to Poch and possible replacement manager not favouring some those Poch favoured. Perhaps Poch told him as much?! Who knows.
11.) 28 Jan 2025 11:36:38
I don’t recall any rumour that we “tapped up” Olise. I seem to remember Ed002 saying he was in a list of targets. I also find it hard to believe that as our owners self reported an issue that they would sanction a breach of protocol. Leave that approach to Klopp. haha.
I assume reading between the lines is just another term for guessing and we all do that. I’m afraid I don’t have a very suspicious mind.
12.) 28 Jan 2025 11:39:21
JBS, you are correct that “rumours” suggested there was a split at various levels about Poch. That sort of split can happen in most corporates. If I was Poch it wouldn’t have given me a very warm feeling.
19 Jan 2025 14:12:46
I love the rumours of a transfer window.
Evan Ferguson to Chelsea in the summer is the latest one with us asking about a loan in this window.
1.) 19 Jan 2025 19:31:51
He would be the last ST we need right now Tom.
He has been injured, hardly played and probably lacks confidence.
2.) 20 Jan 2025 00:40:07
Very much against buying him. But it’s that point of desperation we need another striker / option so loan, meh why not,
3.) 20 Jan 2025 09:04:35
We should surely give Guiu more of a chance in role of young striker with lots of potential. What we need right now is finished article to assist Jackson or for EM to get Nkunku firing in that role. The Dif Delap continues to impress for Ipswich in the EPL - and he did look good against us - he might well be an excellent summer signing though could be at a v high price I guess.
4.) 20 Jan 2025 09:06:24
PS and if adding a new striker it should de someone who can head the ball!
TomB's banter posts with other poster's replies to TomB's banter posts
16 Feb 2025 16:14:37
Over the last few days a so called financial expert has delivered his conclusions on the Man City charges.
He concluded that City would in all likelihood receive a points deduction. This will range between 60-100pts plus the all of the City board members would be forced to resign.
Even at the lower end of his punishment estimates this would bring about the relegation of City.
I must also say the person delivering this conclusion is the same bloke who has consistently said CFC must be in breach of FFP/ PSR.
I don't know if any such punishments would be put in place this season subject to an appeal. Or, if City would start next season on minus? Points.
1.) 16 Feb 2025 17:04:23
Tom, it all sounds very speculative. However, we still have that historical PSR issue from RA’s time. I’m not sure why it is taking so long as we self-reported. Last I heard we were trying to come to a settlement as we did with UEFA.
2.) 16 Feb 2025 17:39:07
Jimbo, from the outside these procedures seem so long winded but I guess they have to be thorough.
16 Feb 2025 09:43:48
I will be missing for a while, unfortunately some rather nasty but necessary hospital treatment. Me being missing will have nothing to do with Chelsea geting stuffed by Villa and Southampton.
Be nice to one another lads, stay safe and be happy.
Anyway COME on MY MIGHTY BLUES.
1.) 16 Feb 2025 12:23:52
Hope all goes well for you Tom, stay safe.
2.) 16 Feb 2025 12:29:31
Good luck with the treatment Tom and trust it goes as smoothly and effectively as possible. Your posts will be missed of course. Though a rest from CFC matters right now may not be a bad thing in itself!
3.) 16 Feb 2025 13:38:54
Thank you both.
JBS my tickets will be going up on the exchange site tomorrow morning.
If you do manage (unlikely) to get them in the MH upper, I have been assured by CFC ticketing that stewards will be asking for proof of membership from the people sitting in our seats.
4.) 16 Feb 2025 15:48:15
Take care, and best of luck, TomB!
5.) 16 Feb 2025 16:16:04
Thanks Tom for heads-up about your season ticket.
6.) 16 Feb 2025 16:18:55
Thanks Emil.
15 Feb 2025 22:08:50
Just finished watching hing the b Friday night Brighton game again and yes I know I must be a glutton for punishment.
A few things, the more I looked at the EF disallowed goal the more I thought it was a soft foul but if it been the other way I would have been calling out for that decision. In the two games we have conceded two goals that created complete panic both in my opinion should have been easily dealt with by our defence. The latest panic goal was more upsetting because it involved a player I rate highly in Colwill. In the game against the happy hammers he got bullied by Kudos and then started remonstrating to the ref about a non existent foul. In the latest game against Brighton he was just in my opinion just soft and lazy.
Colwill was starting to get a partnership going with Fofana but I am expecting more from him than I have seen lately.
1.) 15 Feb 2025 23:56:08
He’s awful and not the usual standard we require.
2.) 16 Feb 2025 03:41:22
Colwill is 21, ridiculously young to be a starting CB in a team challenging for top 4. But, not only is he starting week in, week out, he's expected to play like the senior CB in the team too. Where's the senior pro, pulling him to one side, educating him, telling him to be stronger, how to be smarter? Is that Tosin in this squad, does he carry that gravitas?
Building the youngest squad in the EPL is fine, but you need an experienced core at GK, CB, CM and ST. If you want to challenge for top four, or (in our wildest dreams) the league that experience also has to be of a very high standard. Colwill is one of the best CB's in the league, in his age group, but he's on this pedestal with expectations that he's going to play like a van Dijk, when he should be playing alongside a van Dijk.
Carragher was actually correct during the Brighton game. This is Chelsea, we're not a project club, the project happened twenty years ago. We're serial winners, well we were at least, and we don't want to hear that we'll be ready to be winners in five years time.
3.) 16 Feb 2025 08:58:03
We obviously have been serial winners and to some extent that success has made it difficult, if not impossible to except periods when winning doesn’t happen. The amount that the new owners have spent raises our expectations.
Other clubs have also spent significant amounts of money and spend years and in some cases decades without winning any major trophy or any trophy at all.
I have said that I think the club/ owners should have given themselves more time and warned against the owners making “statement” signings in the very early days of their tenure. That criticism does not mean that I believe the club needed a major club overall.
Colwill having a bad couple of games will not change my opinion about his ability but I think CH’s need a partner next to them and although I haven’t always been entirely convinced about Fofana, together they were showing signs of solid partnership. Some have pointed to Fofana being injured as the reason or starting point of our slump in form.
Every time Carragher comes on TV I can only think of him gobbing into the face of his own supporters. So I’m not a fan. That dislike of him doesn’t mean he can’t be right and I guess time will tell.
I think our current owners will buy and sell lots more players over the course of their ownership. I think that fan’s favourites will also be sold if the price is right. The trading of players is nothing new but as I mentioned on a previous post this is trading/ change on “steroids.
The SD’s come in for a huge amount of criticism and some of it may be fair criticism but I have no idea if they acting under the owners instructions. If the owners believe that the SD’s have generally carried out there inspections they will probably keep there jobs.
If I am correct and the managers performance will be judged at the end of this season and not as EM reported after 2/ 3 seasons. Again I’m only guessing but I find it hard to believe that after such a huge player investment the owners didn’t see Champions League qualification as a minimum target. Again I’m only guessing but I also believe that not being in the Champions League this season has effected the clubs decision about making a long term FOS sponsorship deal that started this season. If that makes sense.
4.) 16 Feb 2025 10:27:00
Trouble is J, the owners have made us a laughing stock and we are a project club to them, hence the appointment of Maresca.
5.) 16 Feb 2025 11:13:25
agree colwill is still so young an is playing in a terrible side defensively with 2 of the worst keepers in the league behind him, when fofana is fit you will see colwill settle down again
Enzo fernadez id definetly start putting feelers out for him he's dreadfull overated world cup star like james rodriquez he's been dreadfull leaves our team wide open still can't believe we left galagher go wed be such a better team with conor and caicedo cm
Lavia is a waste of space cut our loses and sell
id sell madueke when estevao comes in he's been dreadfull and his attitude is terrible,
id sell chalobah and use the money on a leader like geuhi, trevoh bar his debut has been deadfull
This summer we have estevao coming in,
Santos coming back,
Petrovic all 3 start in this current team
Sell sanchez to saudi or anyone whol take him,
Sell madueke i think there's a good market there for him
Sell chalobah definetly a market for trevoh
Sell Nkuku he's been dreadfull
use the money for centre half and striker there isn't too many keepers better than petrovic available id give him a go he had a great 2nd half to the season
Next season
my team
GK-petrovic sub jorgensen
Defence-james fofana colwill cucurella subs god knows whol be left
Midfield-santos caicedo cm player 10
estevao and jackson on the wings iv a real soft spot for jackson but he's not a striker his work rate would be a huge asset out wide
Subs, neto sancho george lavia enzo
Striker- Oshimen go get him for crying out loud we have not had a top end striker since costa 2017 its embarrassing we screwed up so much in the summer that he went to gala
subs guehi and maybe jackson in cup games
I do feel like if maresca is still in charge it will be delap not oshimen
Just a bit of fun and my own opinion throwing it out there i think lavia is a top young player and if fit he starts every other week but he's been a disaster.
6.) 16 Feb 2025 12:27:01
I think that is the problem Poch.
I think we all agree that Reece, Lavia and Fofana walk into the team but how many games will they be fit for.
It shows that we cannot carry these type of players, pipping in and out of the team when they are fit.
7.) 16 Feb 2025 12:31:42
Periods of not winning silverware are perfectly acceptable, but periods outside of the Champions League aren't. The foundations for sustained success were there when the current owners took over. They ripped them all up and decided, via what I can only believe is their own hubris, to rebuild it all, and that rebuild has, so far, been a complete failure, both on and off the pitch.
8.) 16 Feb 2025 13:48:16
“j” lot a lot of fans I was shocked at the early decisions and to a certain extent the pace of that initial change.
What followed was of their own making and in my opinion delayed any chance of CL qualification for a period of time. For that reason I didn’t have ambitious targets for last season and Potter, in my opinion, had zero chance given the chaos he was being asked to deal with.
However, I fully expected us to be challenging for CL football this season and the title next season. I guess what I’m saying is I will have given them more than a reasonable amount of time to prove to me they can own a club with winning trophies as its core value.
15 Feb 2025 11:38:01
For those interested there is a comment piece made on the Pys site that is worth looking at. It gives an alternative view and maybe one I don't necessarily agree with but at least it's trying to put forward a solution.
1.) 15 Feb 2025 12:41:52
Pys Tom?
2.) 15 Feb 2025 12:44:52
Hi Tom what or where is the Pys site?
3.) 15 Feb 2025 13:01:59
Think I've found right place by googling psy chelsea
If so the message seems to be that Boehly better than co-ownership in terms of caring about the club and football but sidelined by bigger shareholders Egboli and Co.
Possibly some truth in this and it seemed likely that Boehly wanted Pich to stay after getting the club seemingly back on steady course after inheriting the horror show that was the previous season. then needing to blend in multiple young players with old plus injury list etc. They did have supper together before decision made and report suggested one owner against sacking him which was likely Boehly as the minority shareholder. CG may then have stayed as well and some back tracking in only buy youngsters and hire an inexperienced manager who would buy into the process policy.
4.) 15 Feb 2025 13:21:11
JBS, yes that is the article. I found it to be an article with a slightly different slant on things. Let me also stress I’m not sure I agree with all of the articles suggestions.
5.) 15 Feb 2025 13:58:20
Understood Tom and it is quite hard to know what is true about TB v Egboli plus weight OF SD influence o.
15 Feb 2025 04:58:40
I'm not sure what the likely outcome of this latest City judgement will have on clubs.
Will damages be sought by certain clubs from the premiership?
Can clubs have what amounts to internal sponsorship deals without a "fair value" test?
Could the judgement affect premiership FFP rules?
Can or will the premiership appeal this latest judgement?
I would welcome the thoughts of the Ed's on this subject before I start jumping to all sorts of crazy assumptions.
{Ed001's Note - it is far too soon to tell yet Tom, every club is busy studying this but it is going to make a huge mess.}
1.) 15 Feb 2025 10:01:12
Thanks Ed, I can see owners putting up subsidiaries as sponsors and saying it’s worth £100m a season or more. That will then change the FFP/ PSR calculations. As you say, a potential huge mess.
I’ve said before I’m not a fan of the current FFP/ PSR rules. I prefer the owner having to put up a bond that covers all the costs of a club for a fixed period of time.
{Ed001's Note - I prefer your idea.}
2.) 15 Feb 2025 10:38:07
Yours is a great idea Tom.
3.) 15 Feb 2025 10:54:57
Surely it makes sense that a more balanced approach would be to let owners do their own thing but it will cost them approximately twice as much.
The downside is for some owners money is not a problem but at least it would be a transparent solution.
16 Feb 2025 16:26:34
Jimbo, I had no idea that is the ST price at BM. What brilliant value and what a heart warming comment from there president.
A West Ham supporter mate was telling me the other week that when the owners of the happy hammers put forward the case for moving to the Olympic stadium was an increase in stadium capacity would bring down the price of seats and ST’s. Apparently the reverse has happened.
Moooooo.
16 Feb 2025 13:33:33
I am not “spinning” anything. I have made it clear several times that mathematically there could be a financial case for not agreeing to a long term FOS deal. i have also made it very clear that I am guessing.
I have no idea if a short term FOS deal was available without including the WCC but I am happy to except any information on that subject. My guess is that adding the WCC to a long term deal and a potential campaign in next season’s Champions League would offer one hell of a lot of money. Of course there is also a risk attached to such a commercial decision.
15 Feb 2025 19:20:03
The maths of the FOS sponsor is interesting. As I’ve said before and I am only guessing a one season deal even at £40 may not be as beneficial to a long term deal. Obviously the term of any deal will be subject to us potentially qualifying for the CL and our participation in the WCC.
15 Feb 2025 16:16:35
Seymns and Bill, I knew Mathew Harding reasonably well and he wasn’t the nicest person in the world and on the other side we had Bates who was maybe one of the most difficult people in the world. It was always a recipe for disaster.
Just as a very small footnote the widow and family of MH played an important part in the transformation of CFC and that for me should never be forgotten.!
15 Feb 2025 14:31:15
Bill, from what I have read there is an opinion that says our club was seriously undervalued when it was sold to our current owners. There is also a theouabout potential sports revenue schemes going through the roof in seasons to come.
The reported losses we very likely turn to profit as the clubs recruitment ambitions change over the next few seasons.
16 Feb 2025 17:39:07
Jimbo, from the outside these procedures seem so long winded but I guess they have to be thorough.
16 Feb 2025 16:18:55
Thanks Emil.
16 Feb 2025 13:48:16
“j” lot a lot of fans I was shocked at the early decisions and to a certain extent the pace of that initial change.
What followed was of their own making and in my opinion delayed any chance of CL qualification for a period of time. For that reason I didn’t have ambitious targets for last season and Potter, in my opinion, had zero chance given the chaos he was being asked to deal with.
However, I fully expected us to be challenging for CL football this season and the title next season. I guess what I’m saying is I will have given them more than a reasonable amount of time to prove to me they can own a club with winning trophies as its core value.
16 Feb 2025 13:38:54
Thank you both.
JBS my tickets will be going up on the exchange site tomorrow morning.
If you do manage (unlikely) to get them in the MH upper, I have been assured by CFC ticketing that stewards will be asking for proof of membership from the people sitting in our seats.
16 Feb 2025 12:41:43
The Stuttgart manager would be my No1, No2 and No3 choice but I hope it isn’t necessary.
I have always wanted us to sign Osimhen but I think that boat has now permanently sailed I would have Isak as my No1 choice followed by Sesko.
I have a feeling the club won’t sign a keeper but if they do I would have Luiz (spelling) as my No1 choice.
The biggest signing isn’t necessary as we have Lavia who (if he can stay fit) in my opinion will be top player for us.