12 Jun 2026 12:49:33
This could open up a huge can of worms.
Everton to pay Burnley millions over PSR breaches. Burnley FC has won its legal dispute with Everton FC after the club sued the Toffees for breaching Premier League rules, The Lawyer understands.
Everton has been ordered to pay Burnley compensation and interest of nearly £40m, although it intends to appeal.
The case went to trial in the Autumn, with the Premier League expected to publish the judgment sometime this week.
Everton, which was defended by Pinsent Masons, was deducted 10 championship points in late 2023 for breaches of the Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) in the 2021/22 season.
This was reduced to six points on appeal in early 2024.
Burnley, which instructed King and Spalding, subsequently sued Everton after it was relegated to the Championship in 2022, the same year that Everton breached the PSR.
The Premier Leagues rules allow for clubs to seek compensation from other clubs for rule breaches that cause them loss.
It is believed that part of Burnleys claim is that, had the six point deduction taken place in 2022, Everton would have been relegated and Burnley would have stayed in the Premier League.
Burnleys case is understood to be based on the legal principle of loss of chance. In such a situation, a club like Burnley might argue that, although it was not certain that it would have stayed in the Premier League, Evertons rule breaches deprived it of a real chance of doing so.
Damages in these cases are typically calculated by taking into account the value of the lost opportunity and the likelihood of success.
Dropping down to the Championship typically brings with it substantial revenue losses. Conversely, with the winner promoted to the Premier League, the Championship play-off final is considered to be worth about £200m and described as the richest match in football.
Reports suggested that Burnley had sought at least £50m from Everton in
The Lawyer understands that Everton plans to appeal, with a hearing hoped to be scheduled before the end of the year.
The decision is believed to be the first of its kind and will likely have a significant impact on future financial fair play disputes, with clubs that breach rules facing not only a sporting sanction but also the possibility of compensation claims from other clubs.
Manchester City and its rivals will be closely following the appeal and any legal precedent it sets.
Several Premier League clubs are understood to have lined up legal counsel to sue City for compensation, should it be found to have breached League rules in the 115 charges case brought against it.
The clubs were contacted for comment.
How will this impact Everton going forward? 40 Million is a huge hit.
Chelsea Banter
Use our rumours form to send us chelsea transfer rumours.
13 Jun 2026 12:52:01
In order to view all of today's banter, you may have to visit our Chelsea banter 2 to Chelsea banter 10 pages linked at the bottom of this page.
12 Jun 2026 08:40:27
Lionel Scaloni on Valentin Barco.
I have to say it clearly, this boy is going to be Argentina’s next big thing.
I look at Valentin and I see things that simply don't correspond to a kid his age. His work rate? Unbelievable.
Honestly, for someone so young, he plays every single minute like his life depends on it; there is no hesitation, no saving energy for later, just pure, absolute commitment.
But what truly blows my mind is his vision and his mentality. You don't teach that.
That kind of reading of the game, that composure under pressure, it doesn’t belong to a player with his experience.
He’s at Chelsea now, and I have no doubt he’s destined to be a cornerstone for this national team in the post-Messi era.
Has anyone seen much of him? Seems to be making a big impression for the national team.
12 Jun 2026 10:32:12
There's no agreement to sign him yet, apparently.
12 Jun 2026 11:35:15
He will run himself into the ground. However, it remains to be seen if he can remain disciplined in a system. In France, the pitch often feels twice the size when watching the game, as games are often ridiculously open.
He had a superb year at Strasbourg, but was at fault more than once for being wildly out of position, chasing balls like a bull terrier. Hopefully, he learns the system Xabi wants quickly and can be a big addition to the squad.
12 Jun 2026 13:36:58
As per CFC1221, there is no agreement yet to sign him.
12 Jun 2026 13:57:50
I guess it will depend on Alonso and whether he wants him or not. He may well have other players in mind.
12 Jun 2026 18:05:30
Agreed, Greenaway, but if we want him and he has a good WC, his fee will increase.
12 Jun 2026 22:27:42
Bill, is he not a Blue.co player already?
11 Jun 2026 20:31:20.
Looking at the way Alonso will set up our back line, probably a 3, who would my fellow posters bring in at Centre back? I'm assuming Levi, Josh, Hato and Reece James will be in contention with Disasi, BB, Tosin and maybe Fofana moving on with Sarr possibly going on loan.
For me, I would like a JT type, a proper dominant defender, good talker, great with either peg and someone who can organise whilst having that monster mentality Alonso talks about. Not many made like that anymore, maybe a VVD?
11 Jun 2026 21:56:57
Greenaway, what about Dan Ballard?
11 Jun 2026 23:38:07
Lacroix would be my first choice, a quick, uncompromising defender, can play right side or central centre back roles. He would pair nicely with Colwill.
For me, he and Colwill would be first choice. Outside of injury, there is no reason they cannot start every league game next season. You then bring Hato or Acheampong in, at LCB or RCB respectively, to make up the three, and share minutes.
I'd keep Tosin and Chalobah as backups, mainly keeping Tosin because he is apparently a strong / positive character in the group. But, outside of Colwill, he's also our best passer out from the back.
12 Jun 2026 08:42:38
Dean Huijsen for me, and maybe even Thiago Silva as player/coach.
12 Jun 2026 12:33:05
As I posted ages ago, apparently RM asked about Enzo and we asked them about Huijsen.
For me, that deal would be good business for Chelsea, but I think it's unlikely RM would let him go!!
12 Jun 2026 14:54:13
I certainly wouldn't turn my nose up at Hoijsen, and I don't think he's a Mourinho type, so not implausible that he sweetens a Fernandez deal. I just feel like we need more of a Rudiger style, physically imposing, aggressive, CB to complement our other CBs.
12 Jun 2026 22:28:35
Would be a good move, J, in my opinion.
11 Jun 2026 14:47:25
A big part of our summer transfer business hinges on Fernandez. If he stays, he could fill the left 10 spot, but if he goes it’s certainly a position we need to bring someone into. It also impacts the profile we’d be potentially looking for in the pivot.
If I were the club, with such a long time left on his contract, I’d have been clear that we’re willing to negotiate at £120m up until the start of the World Cup, any later negotiations will involve a price hike. By all accounts there’s been zero club to club contact from any of his suitors. Is it time to tell him he won’t be sold this summer, report back after the World Cup? We don’t want to be scratching around for a replacement at the end of the window.
In other news, Mhueka and Murray-Campbell, from the youth setup, have been told they can have loans next season. Alonso is apparently keen to see a pathway to the first team for youth players. On that note, some players will have a chance to impress during the summer. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Derry get a spot in the first team squad next season. Kavuma-McQueen and Walsh could impress during preseason too, but, without European football this year it’s tough to see space for them.
11 Jun 2026 18:21:51
Hmm, Real Madrid in for Bernardo Silva and Mourinho wants Fernandes from West Ham. Things don't look like they're panning out the way Enzo Fernandez might have wanted.
11 Jun 2026 20:11:18
Time will tell, J. Personally, I feel he is angling for a new contract and payrise. I expect him to stay.
12 Jun 2026 00:46:10
It is certainly looking like he won't have many options, but I fully expect a transfer request to be handed in and Madrid to bid low with Citeh. We can put as high a price tag as we want, but when he pulls an Isac and refuses to return to training, our options become much more limited.
12 Jun 2026 07:30:13
I don't think he does that. Might be wrong, but I think he's more likely to see the season out and see if a move materialises next summer.
12 Jun 2026 08:44:36
I actually think Enzo Fernandez is a decent person, and really don't see him acting like Isac Melbourne.
12 Jun 2026 11:31:24
Time will tell. While he may be a decent player, I think a decent person may be a stretch.
Also, while you may not believe he would pull an Isac, he already did as much at Benfica, leaving Portugal without permission (well prior to any sale), and it was widely reported that he said he would not return to play for them again.
There is a reason the Benfica fans hate him with a passion. He is the type of bloke to kiss the badge one week and refuse to ever play for the same club a week later.
I'm not surprised he would be welcomed into the squad next year by some supporters, as the club seem to have lost any semblance of self-respect since the new owners showed up.
12 Jun 2026 14:01:21
Enzo Fernandez is the first player to come over to us after away games, and also the last to leave. He shows tremendous respect to us away fans, and his name is sung more than any other player.
11 Jun 2026 10:51:18
Hi Ed. I hope you are keeping safe and well?
Can I ask your opinion and potential fall out from the recent Everton damages in favour of Liverpool.
a) I assume as we were not deducted points for our most recent irregularities we would be unlikely to find ourselves in the same position as Everton.
b) if as expected City are found guilty on multiple counts spread over many years, do you think it likely that teams denied, say a Champions League spot, will take City to court for potential damages?
I hope that all make sense?
{Ed001's Note - in favour of Liverpool? I take it you meant Burnley! Everton have already admitted culpability and paid a small amount to Leeds in recompense, so this is simply a negotiation over the size of the fine really.
a) I very much doubt there will be anything similar with regards to Chelsea, I can't see who would have the potential to challenge when you were not in a relegation battle.
b) There is very much a possibility that teams may take legal action against Citeh, as this has opened a big can of worms. However, I would not expect it to come to anything as it is difficult to prove they would not have made the top 4 (or even top 2 for that matter) without the extra money.}
11 Jun 2026 12:08:37
Thanks for your reply Ed and yes, I did mean Burnley.
11 Jun 2026 12:57:01
I see some Everton fans are saying clubs, including them, should now take Liverpool to court for loss of European revenue during the 80s, when English clubs were banned from European competitions following the Liverpool fan trouble. I believe Everton were a regular European competitor in those days.
11 Jun 2026 17:16:42
greenaway you do post some utter nonsense at times. just not relevant to mention that.
11 Jun 2026 18:33:08
I think Greenaway is just posting what he has heard or read from some Everton fans.
Most Everton fans seem to be aggrieved about the amount involved, and it is probably understandable. I guess it's human nature to ask the question, "why us and why not them", no matter how tenuous the link may be.
11 Jun 2026 20:17:43
Maybe not relevant to Liverpool fans, Kaz, but, as Tom said, I just brought up what some Everton fans have been saying. Apparently, they were very aggrieved in the mid 80's to be robbed of revenue from European competitions due to the 5 year ban on English clubs following the Liverpool fan trouble.
12 Jun 2026 08:47:28
I had forgotten about that 5 year European ban for English clubs following the Liverpool fans trouble. Imagine the lawsuits today if that happened?
12 Jun 2026 17:19:57
Not sure where these Everton fans are, Greenaway - I work in Liverpool and have not heard that one yet... Like I said, not relevant to the modern day.
12 Jun 2026 21:20:58
It's a banter page, Kaz. Don't get too worried by my opinions or the opinions of Everton fans who clearly feel aggrieved whether or not it is relevant to you. Chill out, bro.
10 Jun 2026 22:23:58
Morgan Gibbs White, Arda Guler or Morgan Rogers? Who we going for?
11 Jun 2026 02:27:23
1. Morgan Gibbs-White
2. Morgan Rogers
3. Arda Guler
That would be my order of preference. Guler marked down because of lack of Prem experience, but I'd be reasonably happy with any of them as a signing.
11 Jun 2026 09:17:50
None, just they would all cost too much, indeed. I can see transfer fees really shooting up this summer.
11 Jun 2026 10:01:00
I agree with Bill, none of them. Alonso likes to play with two number 10's, so let's play Palmer, Enzo Fernandez and Estevao in those positions. Joao Pedro can also play in there as well. If Palmer or Fernandez were to leave, then that becomes a different conversation.
Also, as Bill rightly says, transfer fees are becoming utterly ridiculous, I mean, £115 million being quoted for Elliot Anderson?
11 Jun 2026 10:26:59
I would love Gibbs White in our squad.
I like Anderson as a player, but I'm not overwhelmed.
11 Jun 2026 14:30:41
I agree. Gibbs-White and Morgan Rogers are overhyped and will be overpriced, mainly because they are English. Those two along with Anderson being touted around for £80 to £110 million is ridiculous. None of them have proved themselves at the highest level.
11 Jun 2026 18:36:43
I think there is already a bid on the table for Anderson at around £110m. I think Forest will sell at £120m.
Surely the authorities have to announce the City judgement before the window opens?
11 Jun 2026 19:30:26
Tom, £120 million for Anderson? A player who has had a season and a bit in the PL. That makes our asking price for Enzo look reasonable. As for the City verdict, it doesn't matter really. City will appeal if it goes against them, and if it doesn't, the Premier League will lose credibility and probably appeal as well.
11 Jun 2026 19:55:39
Yep, £120m for Anderson. It's madness but it's what happens when a club has no need to sell and the other club is desperate to buy.
I think City will get a 60pts deduction, so it does matter to players, fans, and maybe other clubs. The clearer the picture, the better the decision making process for all concerned.
I am sure they will appeal, but I think there is more chance the penalty gets increased. I also think there could be a recruitment ban, plus a heavy fine. That's my real reason for thinking any punishment should happen before the window opens.
11 Jun 2026 22:01:39
Tom, even if City are found guilty there will be a separate trial regarding sanctions. If found guilty, City will no doubt appeal either to CAS or domestic courts, and then later, if necessary, they will appeal against any sanctions. This will go on well beyond next season. 🥱
12 Jun 2026 12:42:01
Of course, they will appeal, and it may well be that any sports appeal will be heard very quickly, given the impact these decisions have on a season.
City may well choose to go to domestic courts, but I can't remember any precedent for that following a regulatory ruling. I think they would be doomed to fail, and may well be thrown out very quickly.
From all we know, City have not cooperated with the process. My guess is this will influence the judgment, and any appeal.
I think they will get a points deduction (not enough), a transfer ban, and a heavy fine. Also, when the findings are made public, I would be surprised if HMRC didn't start an investigation.
12 Jun 2026 15:52:30
Tom, these proceedings are extremely complex. I doubt whether a sports tribunal would be able to determine the matter quickly. As far as domestic appeals, it would have to be a Judicial Review of the process rather than the findings. The inordinate delay in publishing a decision is often used to quash decisions. Trust me, this will go on and on.
12 Jun 2026 16:05:57
Jimbo, most recent sports appeals have been heard very quickly (if needed), and, as this will affect the whole league, I can see this being pushed through very promptly.
I just can't see how a domestic case would stand initial scrutiny by any UK court. I see it as a non starter, but I'm not a lawyer.
13 Jun 2026 08:24:12
Tom, which sports appeals are you referring to? TBH, I don't care about the City case. I am only concerned about the conclusion of the FA investigation regarding our charges.
13 Jun 2026 09:59:31
All of the appeals that have involved a points deduction as a penalty. Because they affect the outcome of a league, they are generally heard quickly.
I think most fans care about the City penalty on lots of fronts. If you're not, ho hum.
13 Jun 2026 11:12:02
Tom, that's very vague. The City case is unprecedented and extremely complex.
13 Jun 2026 12:32:20
No, it's not. It's very clear. Penalties that included points deductions and were appealed have been heard very quickly.
10 Jun 2026 13:24:01
With so much transfer conjecture about both on here, myself included, and in the press oh how much I miss those lists the much loved and much missed ED02 used to provide us with.
10 Jun 2026 14:38:15
Totally agree Greenaway and it's a pity we don't have our own ED to assist us, no offence ED001.
10 Jun 2026 19:39:45
TBF, Ed001 always answers our questions and he has his hands full on the Liverpool site especially lately with the Slot saga.
10 Jun 2026 20:19:41
Jimbo
I agree, ED001 really trys to assist our site but I believe he is more knowledgeable on the Merseyside teams as is ED025 but i'm happy to be corrected.
10 Jun 2026 21:41:50
ED02 was a Chelsea fan Jimbo and his knowledge was fantastic, we miss that a lot. as Bill correctly says ED01 is a Liverpool fan and I think ED25 is Everton.
11 Jun 2026 14:39:44
Greenaway, I know all that. Yes, it would be great to have a Chelsea lead, but if one isn't available, we should be grateful. That's all I meant. The Liverpool site appears to have ITKs we don't, but we do have some know it alls. For the avoidance of doubt, that was a joke. :look 😂
10 Jun 2026 13:09:54
I have just renewed my ST for next season. It’s that time of year when I go into super optimistic mode. Sadly, in recent years reality hits home early.
Anyway, we will obviously win all the domestic competitions.
Come on my mighty Blues.
10 Jun 2026 19:32:02
Tom, I will be renewing my ST. Despite winning two trophies, I was not optimistic about the season gone. I felt the squad was unbalanced and lacked quality in key positions. I think I predicted 6th to 8th. I feel slightly more optimistic about next season. I believe Alonso was a good appointment, but I hope he is allowed to influence comings and goings to suit his style of play.
The squad needs to be substantially trimmed. We have a few academy players bubbling under, who will need some game time. As for signings, quality not quantity. No predictions from me until I see who goes and who comes in.
09 Jun 2026 16:34:21
With the women's team playing at the Bridge next season, and it's now been announced that they will play their cup games at Wimbledon, has anybody heard what the owners are doing with our King's Meadow ground?
09 Jun 2026 17:54:02
Bill, I seem to remember reading that Kingsmeadow will now be our academy venue.
To me, that is a good idea.
09 Jun 2026 18:15:10
That's good news, Tom, glad we are keeping the ground as a venue for our academy.
08 Jun 2026 18:20:13
Latest on Maresca compo.
What is holding up the appointment?
Maresca's final six months at Chelsea were marked by a fractured relationship with the club's ownership.
Compensation negotiations have been made more complex as Chelsea became aware of City's potential interest early in October and December.
Chelsea sources also claim they were aware of complaints from Maresca about the transfer policy at Stamford Bridge.
It is not known whether this played any role in Maresca's departure, but the relationship continued to further deteriorate over a number of issues, including medical staff and team selections.
Despite the tension, Chelsea sources say the hierarchy still respected much of Maresca's work with the players and he remained popular with the majority of the dressing room.
The club feel the upheaval played a major role in the club's drop in form after his exit, with them not ending up qualifying for Europe.
Maresca had been open to renewing his contract early in the season amid interest from Serie A side Juventus.
£10 million please.
08 Jun 2026 20:45:52
RPD, maybe just me, but given the reported circumstances and upheaval, I would want more than £10m.
09 Jun 2026 08:25:12
Personally, Tom,
I would take the £10mil if they also threw in Haaland, Rodri, Doku, Donnarumma and Cherki.
10 Jun 2026 09:22:18
So RM have paid £13mil for Mourhino. That should be our starting point, but then add a tapping up premium on top of the baseline.