Chelsea Rumours Archive October 05 2011

 

Use our rumours form to send us chelsea transfer rumours.


05 Oct 2011 17:12:17
Hi Ed, with our chief scout leaving or already have left does the clubs stance on Eden Hazard still stand? I really feel he is the missing puzzle for our team he can playing attacking mid and on both wings and brings that beat a player attitude and flair i think we are still slightly lacking.

Thanks

PB {Ed002's Note - I don't know who you are referring to scouting wise, but Eden Hazard has expressed his desire to play in Sapin for one of the two big clubs.}

Believable9 Unbelievable5

Scouting wise i believed our head scout suggested there may be a temprament problem with Hazard but then i read that same scout was leaving at the end of his contract this year or may have already left? I dont see Real Madrid or Barcelona trying to sign him though, Real are after Tevez in a player cash deal from what i have read and also the signing of Neymat whilst Barcelona have a stacked squad and i dont see a £25m player be happy playing 30% of matches a season.

I just really feel he is what we are lacking. Never mind

PB

Agree0 Disagree0

He is still very young and willing to wait i believe, plus he is a very good player and may well, in a year or so, force his way into first team contention at either club. The more interesting thing for me is tevez possibly on the radar of RM, if this is true would they still be interested in signing Neymar? {Ed002's Note - I can say that Kia Joorabchian has been seeking discussions with Miguel Pardeza to see if a move for Tevez is possible and what the options are - and I very much expect a player exchange deal is possible. Joorabchian is just the sort of guy who could possibly put together a deal that suits everyone. It is completely unrelated to the Neymar situation. As for PBs note about the scouting - it is correct that someone who is very influential at the club had concerns over Hazard's attitude - but it is unrelated to any head scout, leaving or otherwise.}

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Oct 2011 12:51:53
ED002 a question about this whole stadium malarky,Would Chelsea be willing to share a ground with QPR at white city? Earl's court will be turned into a property and apartment site which really rules that out the equation,other locations may be battersea ?

BLUEBLOOD {Ed002's Note - It is all just conjecture and is not for the short-term. Chelsea would not be interested in a ground share at White City and I suspect it would not be possible to do so before 2020. I did not know about Earl's Courts being turned in to a "property and apartment" site (and neither do the club) - so it is pointless me providing you an update on that. Battersea is probably not financially viable.}

Believable3 Unbelievable4

What do you mean Battersea would not be viable? The cost of property in chelsea/Fulham is more expensive.I would of thought Battersea's drawback is transport links.No tube. {Ed002's Note - The Battersea power station area will have riverfront multi-storey property development unless a more financially viable proposition can be made - an assessment of various options commissioned by the club does not see that Chelsea can provide that at Battersea.}

Agree0 Disagree0