04 Apr 2021 15:57:30
Haaland isn't a 1/ 4 of the player Harry Kane is. Kane is a beast and really deserves better than Spurs next year but it won't be with us. After Lewandowski he is the most complete striker in the world. Very rare you get strength, finishing and playmaking all in one as a striker he is superb.

Haaland goes missing way too much and I feel if he joined Chelsea he'd have the same fate as the likes of Werner, Morata.

1.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 16:21:30
Haalands 20 years old Kane is 27 almost 28,

2.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 16:42:40
And? Let’s buy another player and wait for him to take time to bed in shall we?

3.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 17:17:52
I will take Haaland over Kane: my choice.

4.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 17:17:52
I will take Haaland over Kane: my choice.

5.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 17:33:46
Kane is an experienced player and shouldn't be compared to halaand. the age difference says a lot. I would be happy with any of them because each of them can improve us if hit the ground ground running quickly.

6.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 19:17:23
You have £100 + million, would you buy a 28 year old injury prone striker with no sell on value or a 20 year old who at 20 is scoring regularly in Europe? And my point was comparing an experienced striker to a kid, says more about how good haaland is that his compared to Kane and his 7/ 8 years younger,

{Ed002's Note - Chelsea have not interest in Kane at all.}

7.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 20:00:04
I can’t see it happening but Mbappe will do for me.

8.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 20:21:51
Injury prone is he Matt? Explain?

9.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 21:20:14
I agree Matt- Kane is ‘relatively’ injury prone; besides, thanks for your comment Ed002 about Chelsea not being interested in Kane, I want him (Kane) to end his career at Tottenham just as I want Lionel Messi to end his career at Barcelona.

10.) 04 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 22:25:57
I didn’t mean we had interest I just mean as a comparison a young player woth sell on value to older one not so much, and Harry Kane misses good few games ever season due to injuries, has problems With his ankles . one is better than haaland, no doubt but compare both at 28 on what they’ve achieved, I bet I know which one will have had a better career.

11.) 05 Apr 2021
04 Apr 2021 23:37:19
Ed siad ages ago that we don't have an interest in Kane. We probably won't do any business with Spurs and for good reasons too.

I'd take Mbappe over Halaadn in a heart beat too.

12.) 05 Apr 2021
05 Apr 2021 01:14:59
Haaland has scored plenty for every team he’s played for in every competition he’s played in. He’s clearly on his way to the top and always has a bit of arrogance about him that Timo could learn from. For me, Haaland is a must sign and if he was the only player we signed in the summer I would be content. Obviously would love a CM and winger too though.

13.) 05 Apr 2021
05 Apr 2021 10:21:08
Spot on Saim about bit of arrogance or bullying attitide that many great strikers have that a Werner ( or Morata? ) Could do with having more if. Its confidence plus plus, and so evident in likes of Ronaldo, Ibra, Costa (at peak) and Didier. Please let us have another super confident to arrogant striker!

14.) 06 Apr 2021
06 Apr 2021 06:03:37
Halaand is a specialist goalscorer and beastly too mbampe is slightly overrated I'mo. his hype. Is similar to British players. haland is more needed for me. We also need to ressuffle our attack because they don't seem to deliver. im worried werner. patsob Daka should also considered as he's within 20m.