04 Mar 2013 11:07:22
Me and my brother were having a conversation about which possible tottenham or arsenal players would get in chelsea's team over our current players. We decided on 3 players, bale, wilshere and possibly dembele.

This goes to show really that we have a really strong team on paper, but either aren't performing well enough, lack of decent management, or lacking one or 2 in the key areas.

We also discussed which players we would take to replace our current strikers, and what's worrying is that out of the whole premier league we would only take hernandez, rooney, rvp, aguero, tevez, dzeko and suarez.

Can anyone think of any more players who are better than torres or ba? I struggle to see why chelsea are not fighting for the title with the squad we have.

1.) 04 Mar 2013
I'd take Lennon also

2.) 04 Mar 2013
Kyle walker also.
Cfcmatt.

3.) 04 Mar 2013
Kyle walker, in my opinion is no better than azpilicueta, and lennon ahead of hazard, oscar, bale, mata? don't get me wrong he is a good player, but not in the league of the players above.

4.) 04 Mar 2013
Michu, Mierelles, Suarez, Lambert, Sturridge, Berba are all players I'd take well ahead of Torres, with little thought needed

5.) 04 Mar 2013
It's tough because on the 50/50s we generally give our guys the benefit of the doubt. For instance Cech and lloris are both on similar levels but we give the edge to Cech. Walker and Cesar are the same way.

Tk

6.) 04 Mar 2013
Lukaku is better than ba and Torres.

7.) 04 Mar 2013
You are probably right there Tk.

8.) 04 Mar 2013
Id take bale, even though I can't stand the man, and vertonghen. kyle walker is definitely not as good as azpilicueta he gets caught out of position so much. maybe dembele although he's been quite poor recently. i'd take sandro as well.