Chelsea Rumours Archive July 04 2012
Use our rumours form to send us chelsea transfer rumours.
04 Jul 2012 23:09:35
Chelsea to announce the signing of hulk within the next 24 hours as chelsea have agreed to buy the extra 10% of hulks contract
Samir
Believable6
Unbelievable13
Dude. Give it a rest!
Blue25
Agree0
Disagree0
Samir fella im reserving my thoughts on your info instead of just insulting you if your correct thanks for the heads up.
BlueBen
Agree0
Disagree0
I guess the next 24hours shows how reliable you are Mr Samir, kinda put all your validity into one basket with this Hulk to Chelsea transfer inside knowledge.
PB
Agree0
Disagree0
Extremely rash and presumptuous there Samir, I hope you're right though! You'll look like the biggest nob if this ain't true. But whete are you getting this information from?
Agree0
Disagree0
I'm not saying Samir is wrong but there is so many people that write rubbish on this site but Samir has obviously done research before saying this I hope he is right but I will not be believing anything untill Chelsea or Porto announce that the deal has been complete.
Blue con
Agree0
Disagree0
Samir boy if ur wrong in the next 24 hours you cant put no more transfer information on here lool
Agree0
Disagree0
Here Samir give it a rest man and stop looking for attention !
Agree0
Disagree0
I half wonder if the ed's put this up and Samir is actually one of them ;)
Agree0
Disagree0
I did not write this!! Its not true!!
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 21:13:00
With vdw having a poor euros and maicon nearly 31 is there a chance of glen johnson making a move back to the bridge? {Ed002's Note - I would doubt it.}
Believable2
Unbelievable7
No chance ,, chelsea wanted him when he joined liverpool. he turned down the blues and described his time at chelsea as the worst.
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 21:22:33
I think we need to buy Jovetic
Lukaku and Torres and Sturridge is not good enough to challenge for the league imo. If Torres got injured we would be in trouble. Jovetic or Cavani. Jovetic seems more likely, cant say ive seen him play though.
Jm10
Believable9
Unbelievable7
Trust me Jovetic for 25 mil would be one of the worst deals in football.
Agree0
Disagree0
You want to get Jovetic but you've never seen him play?
How do you know he's better than Lukaku or Sturridge then?
Rich
Agree0
Disagree0
Im hoping for Cavani Jovetic Hulk Ceaser and either Modric or Ganso not asking much i no.
has long has the RB and RW situation is resolved anything really is a bonus for us.
we can but dream a decade ago we would of struggled to sighn any major names now look at us. makes ya proud to be a true blue.
BlueBen.
Agree0
Disagree0
Thats why i say think....reports have been good
Jm10
Agree0
Disagree0
Jovetic is worth 25m hulk is not worth 30, jovetic is magic at only 22, is carrol is 35 and henderson 20 hes worth it
Agree0
Disagree0
Jovetic scored about ten goals from open play last season. Whereas Sturridge had already scored that many halfway through the season. Worth 25 mil..... I think not.
Agree0
Disagree0
A decade ago we were signing players like Zola, Lampard, Jimmy Flloyd Haselbank, Robbie de Matteo the list goes on so to be fair we have been able to sign big players for quite a bit longer than a decade.
Agree0
Disagree0
Remember if we sign Hulk, then we have a extra striker as he can play through the middle. I know it's not his first choice position but, I still think regardless of this we will have to sign another striker, considering that Lukaku may be going on
Loan. But I would worry that Cavani may cause a situation where Torres would feel under pressure again as Cavani is an excellent player and a big name player as well(but Cavani has said he doesn't want to leave Naples anyway so...). So maybe give Sturridge more chances to prove himself as second choice striker, instead of third choice...
PR!
Agree0
Disagree0
Not on the same scale
them players were brought relativly cheap and early on in there careers and devoloped at chelsea and became big names its not the same has attracting made players to your club in the prime of there game.
BlueBen
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 20:59:54
I am dreaming a bit but I'd like us to get hulk and maybe use mereiles in deal, can't see cavani leaving Napoli this yeah, get hulk and azpilcueta and Lucas moura would be brilliant,,
Believable8
Unbelievable8
04 Jul 2012 20:52:54
hey ed, have Chelsea had any long term interest in the possibility of signing RVP?
With the news that he wont sign a new contract, this could be of interest to Chelsea now?
Gabz1 {Ed002's Note - No.}
Believable2
Unbelievable4
04 Jul 2012 20:45:57
Are Chelsea interested in van persie now he refused deal cannot see y we wouldn't be unless u know of anything?
Believable3
Unbelievable4
04 Jul 2012 20:09:02
Despite his injury, Sagna has lots of prem and international experiance do you still think he's a possible solution to our rb problem?
Believable2
Unbelievable12
Two broken legs in a year? No thanks.
Agree0
Disagree0
Haha good one,
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 20:06:32
does training start tomorrow?
Believable2
Unbelievable0
I think so
Agree0
Disagree0
Ye, be up at Cobham at 1.30 sharp - clean boots a must.
Thanks,
RDM
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 19:51:32
Hulk for £40 mil or Cavani for £40 mil??
Thoughts guys? MB
Believable2
Unbelievable2
If we sign cavani its him or torres if we sign hulk you can play both and therefore no disbutes and sitting an in form player on the bench. And hulk is better
Agree0
Disagree0
Very debatable that Hulk is better. Cavani is in a more competitve league plus has scored more goals and works harder for the team.
Agree0
Disagree0
Hulk for me, can play both wide and central striker. Creative, pacey and powerful. Absolutely perfect for the problem RW position. Cavani no doubt is a excellent striker but im guessing we will be playing with 1 central striker this year and that will be Torres. Having both Torres and Cavani although some would say is a good headache is probably a headache RDM could do without
Chelsea Mole
Agree0
Disagree0
Er I say hulk, only because he can play wide and we always lacked width since robben ect left; cavani brilliant striker thou but fingers crossed Torres does well
Agree0
Disagree0
Well they are fundamentally two diffrent players Cavani is a deep lying forward,has were Hulk is mainly a RW or fill in striker,I belive he would be used on the RW for chelsea and therefore a bid for one shoudnt effect any bid we make on the other. what i definatly do Know for certain is we wont be paying 40 mil for either of them.
on a personal note i dont feel has though Cavani is right for chelsea we would have the same issue we had when torres and drogba were paired chelsea playing style will be diffrent next year and i feel torres would benefit more from having a secondary striker like Jovetic behind him. but that just my humble opinion.
BlueBen
Agree0
Disagree0
Hulk any day of the week he can beat a man make goals score goals for fun yup the next best thing to drogba look at him on utube boys.
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 19:43:01
Hey ED are Real Madrid the only other team in for Hulk? {Ed002's Note - No, Manchester City are also interested now.}
Believable1
Unbelievable1
Oh god
Agree0
Disagree0
Were the quoted the same price as us ED is he City's number 1 target? {Ed002's Note - Price is not for discussion - and "number 1" is not something I can answer.}
Agree0
Disagree0
I know you don't like these but who is seen as a potential alternative? Surely it would be a player who is versatile like hulk himself is.
Agree0
Disagree0
Well that's us out he picture,!
Agree0
Disagree0
But if Samir is right and we own '90% of him' then what are we worrying about...
Agree0
Disagree0
NO! I said Chelsea have agreed a fee for the 90%, but are reluctant to pay for the other 10%. Therefore, nothing has been paid for yet! Man City might very well hijack the deal if we remain indecisive.
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
We dont own 90% u person then he would be our player! Hes 90% owned by porto 10% by another party, the issue is getting the 10% from the 3rd party
Carefree
Agree0
Disagree0
Thank You Carefree! Its really not that difficult!
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
I think it's going to be another aguero and Robinho situation. Can't see us getting him if shi*ty get involved. They will just pay him stupid wages.
Ads
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 19:09:15
It seems that Samir may be correct. Hulk is part owned by an Urguay club -Rentistas.
Always Blue
Believable2
Unbelievable4
Cheers Bro!
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
I dont think anybody is doubting Hulk is indeed part owned by another party. The doubt i have however is Porto are well renowned to be a ridiculous hard team to negotiate with. I strongly doubt we have even met Porto's asking price even before we add on difficulties with third part ownerships. All ads up to a very complex deal and Will drag on all summer would be my guess
Chelsea Mole
Agree0
Disagree0
Nobody is questioning Hulk is part-owned by a 3rd party, most South American players are....what people are debating is that Chelsea have agreed a deal with Porto for their share of Hulk.
Just for you Samir,
Steve
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 19:08:08
Hi,ed will chelsea make bid for cavani?if we get cavani then that will be a great great addition. {Ed002's Note - We will see what happens.}
Believable2
Unbelievable2
04 Jul 2012 17:59:42
Hey EDs do you believe Chelsea could sign Paulo Henrique Ganso? Plus we all know Chelsea are actively pursuing a rb an rw but my question is will we then also sign a striker that is discussed constantly or a cm? Cheers for your time {Ed002's Note - There is bunch of stuff sourrounding Ganso still that makes it tough to say what will happen. Certainly there remains interest in a striker.}
Believable2
Unbelievable2
Roughly do you know how many players the club are trying to bring in ED? {Ed002's Note - So if I say seven then you say who - forget it.}
Agree0
Disagree0
No ed you dont have to say who just roughly how many the club are looking in to bring? {Ed002's Note - I am not being dragged in to this.}
Agree0
Disagree0
If you think about it it is likely to be a rb, rw and then it depends on the market
Agree0
Disagree0
I am no Ed, but if my knowledge is correct we are looking at (more or less) an RB and Winger certainly, a striker and possibly a midfielder depending on the movements of current players.
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 17:52:28
Look Guys,
Its really really simple. Chelsea have agreed a fee to buy Hulk's 90% playing rights from Porto. But under English footballing laws, Chelsea have to buy 100% of Hulk's playing rights in order for Hulk to be able to play for Chelsea. Now, the dispute is this:
Chelsea want Porto to buy the remaining 10% from the company that owns 10% of Hulks playing rights, then sell it to Chelsea under the fee they originally agreed. BUT, Porto want Chelsea to buy the 10%, hence paying more than they originally agreed.Samir
Believable5
Unbelievable6
This rumour was on twitter a few days back. all the talk has died down since. seems like bs to me but i could be wrong {Ed002's Note - Ah, Twitter.}
Agree0
Disagree0
Of course it's BS....Samir regularly posts rumours from that hole of a source. I'm not thinking about Hulk playing for Chelsea until both clubs officially announce that a deal has been agreed.
Agree0
Disagree0
True, Ive seen it on twitter aswell. But it has been reported from more "reliable" sources. Sources from different countries (Portugal, Spain and Brazil) that couldnt have possibly made it up at the same time, Unless there was some truth to the claims. And sources close to Porto have also reported something similar. Plus, it does make perfect sense.
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
True, Ive seen it on twitter aswell. But it has been reported from more "reliable" sources. Sources from different countries (Portugal, Spain and Brazil) that couldnt have possibly made it up at the same time, Unless there was some truth to the claims. And sources close to Porto have also reported something similar. Plus, it does make perfect sense.
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
If you are not thinking of a player until it is offically announced why are you here at all surely you would just wait till its on the chelsea website
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
True, Ive seen it on twitter aswell. But it has been reported from more "reliable" sources. Sources from different countries (Portugal, Spain and Brazil) that couldnt have possibly made it up at the same time, Unless there was some truth to the claims. And sources close to Porto have also reported something similar. Plus, it does make perfect sense.
Oh and in future, could you atleast sign your posts please?
Samir {Ed002's Note - This is all BS.}
Agree0
Disagree0
LOL, I dont know why this has posted soo many times, Sorry.
ED, with all due respect, I have it on good authority that its not BS. But obviously you have your own opinion.
Sorry about the trolling.
Samir {Ed002's Note - There is another club interested in Hulk - I assume they will be referred to Chelsea.}
Agree0
Disagree0
Sorry, I dont quite understand. Could you rephrase?
Samir {Ed002's Note - Samir, I have no interest in discussing Hulk with you. It is futile.}
Agree0
Disagree0
Shorter Samir: 'I am passing off my speculation as fact.'
There is clearly no agreement in place, Chelsea have not bought "90%" of anything, nothing has been accepted. As a listed entity FC Porto is required to make a statement to the stock exchange if and when it accepts an offer. It has not done so. Saying that we own 90% is false.
Agree0
Disagree0
No, I said a fee has been agreed to buy the 90% of Hulk. I might have said that we practically own 90% of Hulk but thats because the fee has been agreed. I have NEVER once said that we have actually bought it. Chelsea want to buy Hulk all at once, if that makes sense.
But anyway, dont listen to me if you dont want to. Lets just wait and see.
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
Samir stop chatting bs. You know nothing about it.
Agree0
Disagree0
Samir, stop replying to these foolish posts. Those who want to believe may do dt otherwise no one is forcing you. At the very least he is bringing some info. True or false only time will tell.
MB
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 16:55:55
ed have i missed something because a few people seems to think we own 90% of hulk
curt {Ed002's Note - I have no idea what you have missed Curt. But by the general tone of you posts I think you skipped etiquette classes at the very least.}
Believable7
Unbelievable1
Brilliant
Agree0
Disagree0
And you complain about other people being rude
when you get called out yourself you wont put the posts up or if your infact wrong the post wont get put up
curt {Ed002's Note - Curt, I am completely sick of the abuse on these pages now, and most of it is down to you and a couple of other CSing vegetables. So you get your way to ruin everything.}
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 16:54:15
@samir where did U01 get it that we have bought 90 percent of hulk that is not true,NOTE-chelsea have not lodge any offer for him at all,my uncle clean the president office every morning so he tell me everything about hulk.rodrigo
Believable0
Unbelievable5
Sorry, I did not understand a thing you said.
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
And you never signed your name you no no one in the club mate so why dont u just leave samir to it weather he does no or not.
Agree0
Disagree0
Cheers mate.
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
He signed rodrigo,and whats the weather got to do with it ?
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 13:25:07
Hey Ed Me Again just thought id throw out that reminder about the list you said youd do for us its been a few days so if work allows it would be appriciated mate if not ill remind later on in week, While im here also just wondering if we still hold any intrest in Dembele all reports seem to of gone quiet so thought i would ask cheers pal.
BlueBen {Ed002's Note - Try Friday - I am real short on time.}
Believable1
Unbelievable0
No worries Ed appriciate you have paid work to take care of before this, bills have to be paid i know the feeling. Ill chuck a reminder out friday fella.
BlueBen {Ed002's Note - Appreciate that.}
Agree0
Disagree0
Surely if you aware of who the players are it would not take you more than a few minutes to compile the list, or at least not much longer than it takes you to write your condescending and plainly rude responses to some of the less educated fans. {Ed002's Note - I will try and be nicer to you in the future.}
Agree0
Disagree0
Some ppl make me laugh blueben understands that ed has a job that pays the bills but the post above is an person to say the least if u dont like it p**** off ed keep up the good work and ignore these ppl that either still at school or dont work.
jambo
Agree0
Disagree0
Yeah exactly jambo dontworry fella hes obviously anthor tottenham in disguise
BlueBen
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 15:22:45
Hello Ed002, have Chelsea shown any interest in Kyriakos Papadopoulos? Many thanks - James13 {Ed002's Note - No.}
Believable2
Unbelievable1
Standard James13 comment
Agree0
Disagree0
Standard in what way? And if your going to say something about me put your name after it. - James13
Agree0
Disagree0
He sounds like a curry
Kenny
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 14:16:10
WOW. According to the footballing english rules, English clubs aren't allowed to "part own" a player, even though it is common in Europe and South America. Therefore, untill we own 100% of Hulks playing rights, we cannot officially announce the signing of Hulk because technically he is not fully our player (even if we have pretty much bought 90% of his playing rights).
Samir {Ed002's Note - That is not correct. English clubs can part own players and Chelsea part own several. The rule simply stops part owned players playing in England, not clubs owning them.}
Believable3
Unbelievable0
Yep, sorry for the confusion. What I meant to say was that English clubs aren't allowed to play a part owned player. This is why nothing has been annouced because it would be pointless to announce that Chelsea pretty much own 90% of Hulks playing rights, seeing as that player still could not play for Chelsea fc.
My point stands that Chelsea would have to buy the remaining 10% in order for Hulk to be an official Chelsea player (in a sense that he could then play for Chelsea FC).
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
Samir - your spot on, reports from brazil and Portugal are basically saying the same thing, just got to wait I guess. Blue canton!
Agree0
Disagree0
Thanks Blue Canton!
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
Yeah hopefully this all gets resolved asap so Hulk can settle in and get a full pre-season under his belt.
Agree0
Disagree0
Samir is making it up as he goes along. Chelsea do not "pretty much own" 90% of Hulk because Porto has not accepted anything. Any agreement with Chelsea has to be reported to the Lisbon stock exchange as Porto is a publicly listed company, and no statement to the exchange has been issued by the club.
Speculating about secret done deals with Porto is a waste of time. Because there is no such thing. If and when it happens, we'll know because Porto are duty-bound to disclose it.
Agree0
Disagree0
Sorry If ive missed anything, but have we actually agreed a fee, to say we own approx 90%. I take it Porto just want CFC to cough up the extra 10%.
Thanks
Agree0
Disagree0
Why is it that the ppl calling samir a liar dont sign there names.
jambo
Agree0
Disagree0
I think Chelsea must have only bought 90% of Kalou from feyenoord, it was a pity the 10% we didn't buy was his brain.
Kenny
Agree0
Disagree0
Thats right yes. Chelsea have agreed a fee on principle, but Porto want Chelsea o cough up more money for the 10%, just as you put it.
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
No because porto dont own that other 10% we havent agreed anything samir must of dreamt last night that we signed hulk
curt
Agree0
Disagree0
Jesus Christ Curt, Have you not been paying attention?!? Porto want to buy back the 10% from the company and sell it to Chelsea, Hence increasing the original fee that was agreed. However, Chelsea want Porto to buy back the 10% and sell it to them under the original fee that was agreed.
Samir
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 12:33:42
Hi ED, please tell me the rumour we are hearing about Maicon is not true. If true that certainly feels like regression. I do not rate him at all and remember he had a nightmare against Gareth Bale when then Inter played Spurs a season or so ago. That will just be another recipe for Chelsea to start being beaten by Spurs. Please tell me its not true!! {Ed002's Note - I have already said what I know of Maicon.}
Believable8
Unbelievable1
I totally agree. There are soo many better options! MB
Agree0
Disagree0
Maicon is class. and for 6 million pounds a bargain!
If we get him it gives him a couple of years then we can bring through Todd Kane who i rate highly
Agree0
Disagree0
He was class for one season under mourinho. The rest of his career he has been distinctly average; especially at the back! MB
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 11:21:00
ED is there any interest in Matt Jarvis? {Ed002's Note - Past interest has disappeared as soon as price is mentioned.}
Believable3
Unbelievable4
Someone was watching the press conference ......
Agree0
Disagree0
I'm new to this Jarvis rumour so apologies if I am a little behind but is there any truth that we have made a bid of 4m as Sky Sports have reported?
Agree0
Disagree0
This isn't true, I actually know him, I'm good mates with his brother. I think it's just his agent trying to get his name out there.
NP
Agree0
Disagree0
Why the hell would we want Matt Jarvis?
Agree0
Disagree0
I know Matt Jarvis dad very well he is a top top bloke he is a top table tennis coach and former England No1 also his mum was No 1 also for England but as bias as I am Matt is not quite good enough for Chelsea at this moment I dont think he would improve the team hope Nick dont read this though.
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 10:56:12
ed, the rumored interest in Huntelaar is there anything more to it or was it just a bid Chelsea made to check to see if he is available? {Ed002's Note - I cannot be expected to know if there is some underlying purpose behind a rumour. I am sorry but I simply do not have time to respond to matters of bizarre conjecture. Perhaps others do.}
Believable4
Unbelievable2
Except that you just did! Chippy as ever I see 002!
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 10:10:18
Hi Ed, if what's reported in the papers is true about RVP being 'priced' at 12m ... WHY WONT WE GO FOR HIM!? Best striker in the pl last season and 28m cheaper than what we'd have to pay for the likes of cavani
Chaz {Ed002's Note - Chelsea have no interest in RvP.}
Believable4
Unbelievable7
But older than cavani and has only been a 1 season wonder
curt
Agree0
Disagree0
RvP has only had one season without a long-term injury at Arsenal. Aside from last season he only manages around 20 games on average.
Agree0
Disagree0
More importantly he has already said that he would never move to another English club!
NP
Agree0
Disagree0
03 Jul 2012 22:14:01
ED002 with the shocking news that Sturridge may have Viral Meningitis and may need a break from Football will this mean we may know have to sign a striker? as we only now have 1 striker with Lakaku likely to be going on loan. {Ed002's Note - Chelsea are looking at strikers already - as is constantly discussed.}
Believable0
Unbelievable1
Lukaku*
Agree0
Disagree0
03 Jul 2012 22:05:40
If sturridge goes to spurs, will we look to buy moses? thanks ed {Ed002's Note - The two matters are unrelated.}
Believable2
Unbelievable3
04 Jul 2012 00:43:28
chelsea to sign ibrahimovic £26m
Believable4
Unbelievable40
No thanks load ,of BS you must be tottanham in disguise.
BlueBen
Agree0
Disagree0
26 million on an over 30 and lazy striker ur a joke
Agree0
Disagree0
I hope this is not true, he isnt the sort of player Chelsea should be looking at for the future
Agree0
Disagree0
Most over rated player in world football. I,m more likely to sign as centre forward than him. Stop wasting our time with made up bollox.
Agree0
Disagree0
Id love chelsea to sign him hes big strong and great in the air a perfect replacement for drogba
Agree0
Disagree0
04 Jul 2012 00:02:13
Ed will the players that are involved in the Olympics miss any
Premier league matches, can't afford to lose mata !!
Cheers ed, and keep up the good work
Jm10 {Ed018's Note - there will be no conflict with scheduling but fitness could be an issue. i believe if you make it to the finals players will possibly have played 6 or 7 matches in 3 weeks}
Believable2
Unbelievable2
Who would be your ideal signings this summer ED018? {Ed018's Note - Hulk, Jovetic, Azpilicueta. And maybe Cavani}
Agree0
Disagree0
In other words then mata is going to be playing 6 or 7 games at the olympics
curt
Agree0
Disagree0
03 Jul 2012 23:22:53
To any of the EDs, do Chelsea have any intest in Iker Muniain? Cheers {Ed018's Note - not at the present time}
Believable2
Unbelievable2
03 Jul 2012 22:26:39
Looks like the Cavani to Chelsea rumor is looking very likely, Sky have just put him 6/4 fave to join Chelsea this summer, hope he joins before the US tour. Someone told me who has a relative who works for the ground staff at Stamford Bridge that Didier Drogba is the man who persuaded Cavani to join Chelsea and were seen having a friendly chat after the Champs League game.
Believable9
Unbelievable4
My aunt's neighbour's sister-in-law whose cousin works at Stamford Bridge as a tea lady overheard the same conversation.
Agree0
Disagree0
Hes been 6/4 for the last month. means nothing. ma u were favorites 4 hazzard look how that turned out
Agree0
Disagree0
Wasnt a conversation, it came from one of the players telling some of the staff what was going off before the team left for their holidays. Drogba was leaving the club anyway and said he wanted Cavani to replace him. Big mistake if Chelsea let him slip from their grasp, Barca wouldnt hesitate to buy him and neither would Man City. Hulk is a disaster waiting to happen, bad temperament, part owned by some other person/club/business, has all the warning signs of another Tevez. {Ed021's Note -
Agree0
Disagree0