Chelsea Rumours Archive July 04 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us chelsea transfer rumours.


04 Jul 2012 23:09:35
Chelsea to announce the signing of hulk within the next 24 hours as chelsea have agreed to buy the extra 10% of hulks contract
Samir

Believable6 Unbelievable13

Dude. Give it a rest!

Blue25

Agree0 Disagree0

Samir fella im reserving my thoughts on your info instead of just insulting you if your correct thanks for the heads up.


BlueBen

Agree0 Disagree0

I guess the next 24hours shows how reliable you are Mr Samir, kinda put all your validity into one basket with this Hulk to Chelsea transfer inside knowledge.

PB

Agree0 Disagree0

Extremely rash and presumptuous there Samir, I hope you're right though! You'll look like the biggest nob if this ain't true. But whete are you getting this information from?

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm not saying Samir is wrong but there is so many people that write rubbish on this site but Samir has obviously done research before saying this I hope he is right but I will not be believing anything untill Chelsea or Porto announce that the deal has been complete.

Blue con

Agree0 Disagree0

Samir boy if ur wrong in the next 24 hours you cant put no more transfer information on here lool

Agree0 Disagree0

Here Samir give it a rest man and stop looking for attention !

Agree0 Disagree0

I half wonder if the ed's put this up and Samir is actually one of them ;)

Agree0 Disagree0

I did not write this!! Its not true!!

Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 21:13:00
With vdw having a poor euros and maicon nearly 31 is there a chance of glen johnson making a move back to the bridge? {Ed002's Note - I would doubt it.}

Believable2 Unbelievable7

No chance ,, chelsea wanted him when he joined liverpool. he turned down the blues and described his time at chelsea as the worst.

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 21:22:33
I think we need to buy Jovetic

Lukaku and Torres and Sturridge is not good enough to challenge for the league imo. If Torres got injured we would be in trouble. Jovetic or Cavani. Jovetic seems more likely, cant say ive seen him play though.

Jm10

Believable9 Unbelievable7

Trust me Jovetic for 25 mil would be one of the worst deals in football.

Agree0 Disagree0

You want to get Jovetic but you've never seen him play?

How do you know he's better than Lukaku or Sturridge then?

Rich

Agree0 Disagree0

Im hoping for Cavani Jovetic Hulk Ceaser and either Modric or Ganso not asking much i no.

has long has the RB and RW situation is resolved anything really is a bonus for us.

we can but dream a decade ago we would of struggled to sighn any major names now look at us. makes ya proud to be a true blue.

BlueBen.

Agree0 Disagree0

Thats why i say think....reports have been good

Jm10

Agree0 Disagree0

Jovetic is worth 25m hulk is not worth 30, jovetic is magic at only 22, is carrol is 35 and henderson 20 hes worth it

Agree0 Disagree0

Jovetic scored about ten goals from open play last season. Whereas Sturridge had already scored that many halfway through the season. Worth 25 mil..... I think not.

Agree0 Disagree0

A decade ago we were signing players like Zola, Lampard, Jimmy Flloyd Haselbank, Robbie de Matteo the list goes on so to be fair we have been able to sign big players for quite a bit longer than a decade.

Agree0 Disagree0

Remember if we sign Hulk, then we have a extra striker as he can play through the middle. I know it's not his first choice position but, I still think regardless of this we will have to sign another striker, considering that Lukaku may be going on
Loan. But I would worry that Cavani may cause a situation where Torres would feel under pressure again as Cavani is an excellent player and a big name player as well(but Cavani has said he doesn't want to leave Naples anyway so...). So maybe give Sturridge more chances to prove himself as second choice striker, instead of third choice...

PR!

Agree0 Disagree0

Not on the same scale

them players were brought relativly cheap and early on in there careers and devoloped at chelsea and became big names its not the same has attracting made players to your club in the prime of there game.

BlueBen

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 20:59:54
I am dreaming a bit but I'd like us to get hulk and maybe use mereiles in deal, can't see cavani leaving Napoli this yeah, get hulk and azpilcueta and Lucas moura would be brilliant,,

Believable8 Unbelievable8

04 Jul 2012 20:52:54
hey ed, have Chelsea had any long term interest in the possibility of signing RVP?

With the news that he wont sign a new contract, this could be of interest to Chelsea now?

Gabz1 {Ed002's Note - No.}

Believable2 Unbelievable4

04 Jul 2012 20:45:57
Are Chelsea interested in van persie now he refused deal cannot see y we wouldn't be unless u know of anything?

Believable3 Unbelievable4

04 Jul 2012 20:09:02
Despite his injury, Sagna has lots of prem and international experiance do you still think he's a possible solution to our rb problem?

Believable2 Unbelievable12

Two broken legs in a year? No thanks.

Agree0 Disagree0

Haha good one,

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 20:06:32
does training start tomorrow?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

I think so

Agree0 Disagree0

Ye, be up at Cobham at 1.30 sharp - clean boots a must.

Thanks,

RDM

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 19:51:32
Hulk for £40 mil or Cavani for £40 mil??
Thoughts guys? MB

Believable2 Unbelievable2

If we sign cavani its him or torres if we sign hulk you can play both and therefore no disbutes and sitting an in form player on the bench. And hulk is better

Agree0 Disagree0

Very debatable that Hulk is better. Cavani is in a more competitve league plus has scored more goals and works harder for the team.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hulk for me, can play both wide and central striker. Creative, pacey and powerful. Absolutely perfect for the problem RW position. Cavani no doubt is a excellent striker but im guessing we will be playing with 1 central striker this year and that will be Torres. Having both Torres and Cavani although some would say is a good headache is probably a headache RDM could do without
Chelsea Mole

Agree0 Disagree0

Er I say hulk, only because he can play wide and we always lacked width since robben ect left; cavani brilliant striker thou but fingers crossed Torres does well

Agree0 Disagree0

Well they are fundamentally two diffrent players Cavani is a deep lying forward,has were Hulk is mainly a RW or fill in striker,I belive he would be used on the RW for chelsea and therefore a bid for one shoudnt effect any bid we make on the other. what i definatly do Know for certain is we wont be paying 40 mil for either of them.


on a personal note i dont feel has though Cavani is right for chelsea we would have the same issue we had when torres and drogba were paired chelsea playing style will be diffrent next year and i feel torres would benefit more from having a secondary striker like Jovetic behind him. but that just my humble opinion.


BlueBen

Agree0 Disagree0

Hulk any day of the week he can beat a man make goals score goals for fun yup the next best thing to drogba look at him on utube boys.

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 19:43:01
Hey ED are Real Madrid the only other team in for Hulk? {Ed002's Note - No, Manchester City are also interested now.}

Believable1 Unbelievable1

Oh god

Agree0 Disagree0

Were the quoted the same price as us ED is he City's number 1 target? {Ed002's Note - Price is not for discussion - and "number 1" is not something I can answer.}

Agree0 Disagree0

I know you don't like these but who is seen as a potential alternative? Surely it would be a player who is versatile like hulk himself is.

Agree0 Disagree0

Well that's us out he picture,!

Agree0 Disagree0

But if Samir is right and we own '90% of him' then what are we worrying about...

Agree0 Disagree0

NO! I said Chelsea have agreed a fee for the 90%, but are reluctant to pay for the other 10%. Therefore, nothing has been paid for yet! Man City might very well hijack the deal if we remain indecisive.


Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

We dont own 90% u person then he would be our player! Hes 90% owned by porto 10% by another party, the issue is getting the 10% from the 3rd party
Carefree

Agree0 Disagree0

Thank You Carefree! Its really not that difficult!



Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

I think it's going to be another aguero and Robinho situation. Can't see us getting him if shi*ty get involved. They will just pay him stupid wages.

Ads

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 19:09:15
It seems that Samir may be correct. Hulk is part owned by an Urguay club -Rentistas.

Always Blue

Believable2 Unbelievable4

Cheers Bro!


Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

I dont think anybody is doubting Hulk is indeed part owned by another party. The doubt i have however is Porto are well renowned to be a ridiculous hard team to negotiate with. I strongly doubt we have even met Porto's asking price even before we add on difficulties with third part ownerships. All ads up to a very complex deal and Will drag on all summer would be my guess
Chelsea Mole

Agree0 Disagree0

Nobody is questioning Hulk is part-owned by a 3rd party, most South American players are....what people are debating is that Chelsea have agreed a deal with Porto for their share of Hulk.

Just for you Samir,

Steve

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 19:08:08
Hi,ed will chelsea make bid for cavani?if we get cavani then that will be a great great addition. {Ed002's Note - We will see what happens.}

Believable2 Unbelievable2

04 Jul 2012 17:59:42
Hey EDs do you believe Chelsea could sign Paulo Henrique Ganso? Plus we all know Chelsea are actively pursuing a rb an rw but my question is will we then also sign a striker that is discussed constantly or a cm? Cheers for your time {Ed002's Note - There is bunch of stuff sourrounding Ganso still that makes it tough to say what will happen. Certainly there remains interest in a striker.}

Believable2 Unbelievable2

Roughly do you know how many players the club are trying to bring in ED? {Ed002's Note - So if I say seven then you say who - forget it.}

Agree0 Disagree0

No ed you dont have to say who just roughly how many the club are looking in to bring? {Ed002's Note - I am not being dragged in to this.}

Agree0 Disagree0

If you think about it it is likely to be a rb, rw and then it depends on the market

Agree0 Disagree0

I am no Ed, but if my knowledge is correct we are looking at (more or less) an RB and Winger certainly, a striker and possibly a midfielder depending on the movements of current players.

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 17:52:28
Look Guys,

Its really really simple. Chelsea have agreed a fee to buy Hulk's 90% playing rights from Porto. But under English footballing laws, Chelsea have to buy 100% of Hulk's playing rights in order for Hulk to be able to play for Chelsea. Now, the dispute is this:

Chelsea want Porto to buy the remaining 10% from the company that owns 10% of Hulks playing rights, then sell it to Chelsea under the fee they originally agreed. BUT, Porto want Chelsea to buy the 10%, hence paying more than they originally agreed.Samir

Believable5 Unbelievable6

This rumour was on twitter a few days back. all the talk has died down since. seems like bs to me but i could be wrong {Ed002's Note - Ah, Twitter.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Of course it's BS....Samir regularly posts rumours from that hole of a source. I'm not thinking about Hulk playing for Chelsea until both clubs officially announce that a deal has been agreed.

Agree0 Disagree0

True, Ive seen it on twitter aswell. But it has been reported from more "reliable" sources. Sources from different countries (Portugal, Spain and Brazil) that couldnt have possibly made it up at the same time, Unless there was some truth to the claims. And sources close to Porto have also reported something similar. Plus, it does make perfect sense.


Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

True, Ive seen it on twitter aswell. But it has been reported from more "reliable" sources. Sources from different countries (Portugal, Spain and Brazil) that couldnt have possibly made it up at the same time, Unless there was some truth to the claims. And sources close to Porto have also reported something similar. Plus, it does make perfect sense.


Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

If you are not thinking of a player until it is offically announced why are you here at all surely you would just wait till its on the chelsea website

Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

True, Ive seen it on twitter aswell. But it has been reported from more "reliable" sources. Sources from different countries (Portugal, Spain and Brazil) that couldnt have possibly made it up at the same time, Unless there was some truth to the claims. And sources close to Porto have also reported something similar. Plus, it does make perfect sense.


Oh and in future, could you atleast sign your posts please?

Samir {Ed002's Note - This is all BS.}

Agree0 Disagree0

LOL, I dont know why this has posted soo many times, Sorry.

ED, with all due respect, I have it on good authority that its not BS. But obviously you have your own opinion.

Sorry about the trolling.


Samir {Ed002's Note - There is another club interested in Hulk - I assume they will be referred to Chelsea.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry, I dont quite understand. Could you rephrase?

Samir {Ed002's Note - Samir, I have no interest in discussing Hulk with you. It is futile.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Shorter Samir: 'I am passing off my speculation as fact.'

There is clearly no agreement in place, Chelsea have not bought "90%" of anything, nothing has been accepted. As a listed entity FC Porto is required to make a statement to the stock exchange if and when it accepts an offer. It has not done so. Saying that we own 90% is false.

Agree0 Disagree0

No, I said a fee has been agreed to buy the 90% of Hulk. I might have said that we practically own 90% of Hulk but thats because the fee has been agreed. I have NEVER once said that we have actually bought it. Chelsea want to buy Hulk all at once, if that makes sense.

But anyway, dont listen to me if you dont want to. Lets just wait and see.


Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

Samir stop chatting bs. You know nothing about it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Samir, stop replying to these foolish posts. Those who want to believe may do dt otherwise no one is forcing you. At the very least he is bringing some info. True or false only time will tell.

MB

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 16:55:55
ed have i missed something because a few people seems to think we own 90% of hulk

curt {Ed002's Note - I have no idea what you have missed Curt. But by the general tone of you posts I think you skipped etiquette classes at the very least.}

Believable7 Unbelievable1

Brilliant

Agree0 Disagree0

And you complain about other people being rude

when you get called out yourself you wont put the posts up or if your infact wrong the post wont get put up

curt {Ed002's Note - Curt, I am completely sick of the abuse on these pages now, and most of it is down to you and a couple of other CSing vegetables. So you get your way to ruin everything.}

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 16:54:15
@samir where did U01 get it that we have bought 90 percent of hulk that is not true,NOTE-chelsea have not lodge any offer for him at all,my uncle clean the president office every morning so he tell me everything about hulk.rodrigo

Believable0 Unbelievable5

Sorry, I did not understand a thing you said.


Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

And you never signed your name you no no one in the club mate so why dont u just leave samir to it weather he does no or not.

Agree0 Disagree0

Cheers mate.

Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

He signed rodrigo,and whats the weather got to do with it ?

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 13:25:07
Hey Ed Me Again just thought id throw out that reminder about the list you said youd do for us its been a few days so if work allows it would be appriciated mate if not ill remind later on in week, While im here also just wondering if we still hold any intrest in Dembele all reports seem to of gone quiet so thought i would ask cheers pal.

BlueBen {Ed002's Note - Try Friday - I am real short on time.}

Believable1 Unbelievable0

No worries Ed appriciate you have paid work to take care of before this, bills have to be paid i know the feeling. Ill chuck a reminder out friday fella.

BlueBen {Ed002's Note - Appreciate that.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Surely if you aware of who the players are it would not take you more than a few minutes to compile the list, or at least not much longer than it takes you to write your condescending and plainly rude responses to some of the less educated fans. {Ed002's Note - I will try and be nicer to you in the future.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Some ppl make me laugh blueben understands that ed has a job that pays the bills but the post above is an person to say the least if u dont like it p**** off ed keep up the good work and ignore these ppl that either still at school or dont work.

jambo

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah exactly jambo dontworry fella hes obviously anthor tottenham in disguise

BlueBen

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 15:22:45
Hello Ed002, have Chelsea shown any interest in Kyriakos Papadopoulos? Many thanks - James13 {Ed002's Note - No.}

Believable2 Unbelievable1

Standard James13 comment

Agree0 Disagree0

Standard in what way? And if your going to say something about me put your name after it. - James13

Agree0 Disagree0

He sounds like a curry
Kenny

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 14:16:10
WOW. According to the footballing english rules, English clubs aren't allowed to "part own" a player, even though it is common in Europe and South America. Therefore, untill we own 100% of Hulks playing rights, we cannot officially announce the signing of Hulk because technically he is not fully our player (even if we have pretty much bought 90% of his playing rights).


Samir {Ed002's Note - That is not correct. English clubs can part own players and Chelsea part own several. The rule simply stops part owned players playing in England, not clubs owning them.}

Believable3 Unbelievable0

Yep, sorry for the confusion. What I meant to say was that English clubs aren't allowed to play a part owned player. This is why nothing has been annouced because it would be pointless to announce that Chelsea pretty much own 90% of Hulks playing rights, seeing as that player still could not play for Chelsea fc.
My point stands that Chelsea would have to buy the remaining 10% in order for Hulk to be an official Chelsea player (in a sense that he could then play for Chelsea FC).


Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

Samir - your spot on, reports from brazil and Portugal are basically saying the same thing, just got to wait I guess. Blue canton!

Agree0 Disagree0

Thanks Blue Canton!


Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah hopefully this all gets resolved asap so Hulk can settle in and get a full pre-season under his belt.

Agree0 Disagree0

Samir is making it up as he goes along. Chelsea do not "pretty much own" 90% of Hulk because Porto has not accepted anything. Any agreement with Chelsea has to be reported to the Lisbon stock exchange as Porto is a publicly listed company, and no statement to the exchange has been issued by the club.

Speculating about secret done deals with Porto is a waste of time. Because there is no such thing. If and when it happens, we'll know because Porto are duty-bound to disclose it.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry If ive missed anything, but have we actually agreed a fee, to say we own approx 90%. I take it Porto just want CFC to cough up the extra 10%.
Thanks

Agree0 Disagree0

Why is it that the ppl calling samir a liar dont sign there names.

jambo

Agree0 Disagree0

I think Chelsea must have only bought 90% of Kalou from feyenoord, it was a pity the 10% we didn't buy was his brain.

Kenny

Agree0 Disagree0

Thats right yes. Chelsea have agreed a fee on principle, but Porto want Chelsea o cough up more money for the 10%, just as you put it.


Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

No because porto dont own that other 10% we havent agreed anything samir must of dreamt last night that we signed hulk

curt

Agree0 Disagree0

Jesus Christ Curt, Have you not been paying attention?!? Porto want to buy back the 10% from the company and sell it to Chelsea, Hence increasing the original fee that was agreed. However, Chelsea want Porto to buy back the 10% and sell it to them under the original fee that was agreed.


Samir

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 12:33:42
Hi ED, please tell me the rumour we are hearing about Maicon is not true. If true that certainly feels like regression. I do not rate him at all and remember he had a nightmare against Gareth Bale when then Inter played Spurs a season or so ago. That will just be another recipe for Chelsea to start being beaten by Spurs. Please tell me its not true!! {Ed002's Note - I have already said what I know of Maicon.}

Believable8 Unbelievable1

I totally agree. There are soo many better options! MB

Agree0 Disagree0

Maicon is class. and for 6 million pounds a bargain!

If we get him it gives him a couple of years then we can bring through Todd Kane who i rate highly

Agree0 Disagree0

He was class for one season under mourinho. The rest of his career he has been distinctly average; especially at the back! MB

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 11:21:00
ED is there any interest in Matt Jarvis? {Ed002's Note - Past interest has disappeared as soon as price is mentioned.}

Believable3 Unbelievable4

Someone was watching the press conference ......

Agree0 Disagree0

I'm new to this Jarvis rumour so apologies if I am a little behind but is there any truth that we have made a bid of 4m as Sky Sports have reported?

Agree0 Disagree0

This isn't true, I actually know him, I'm good mates with his brother. I think it's just his agent trying to get his name out there.

NP

Agree0 Disagree0

Why the hell would we want Matt Jarvis?

Agree0 Disagree0

I know Matt Jarvis dad very well he is a top top bloke he is a top table tennis coach and former England No1 also his mum was No 1 also for England but as bias as I am Matt is not quite good enough for Chelsea at this moment I dont think he would improve the team hope Nick dont read this though.

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 10:56:12
ed, the rumored interest in Huntelaar is there anything more to it or was it just a bid Chelsea made to check to see if he is available? {Ed002's Note - I cannot be expected to know if there is some underlying purpose behind a rumour. I am sorry but I simply do not have time to respond to matters of bizarre conjecture. Perhaps others do.}

Believable4 Unbelievable2

Except that you just did! Chippy as ever I see 002!

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 10:10:18
Hi Ed, if what's reported in the papers is true about RVP being 'priced' at 12m ... WHY WONT WE GO FOR HIM!? Best striker in the pl last season and 28m cheaper than what we'd have to pay for the likes of cavani

Chaz {Ed002's Note - Chelsea have no interest in RvP.}

Believable4 Unbelievable7

But older than cavani and has only been a 1 season wonder

curt

Agree0 Disagree0

RvP has only had one season without a long-term injury at Arsenal. Aside from last season he only manages around 20 games on average.

Agree0 Disagree0

More importantly he has already said that he would never move to another English club!

NP

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2012 22:14:01
ED002 with the shocking news that Sturridge may have Viral Meningitis and may need a break from Football will this mean we may know have to sign a striker? as we only now have 1 striker with Lakaku likely to be going on loan. {Ed002's Note - Chelsea are looking at strikers already - as is constantly discussed.}

Believable0 Unbelievable1

Lukaku*

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2012 22:05:40
If sturridge goes to spurs, will we look to buy moses? thanks ed {Ed002's Note - The two matters are unrelated.}

Believable2 Unbelievable3

04 Jul 2012 00:43:28
chelsea to sign ibrahimovic £26m

Believable4 Unbelievable40

No thanks load ,of BS you must be tottanham in disguise.

BlueBen

Agree0 Disagree0

26 million on an over 30 and lazy striker ur a joke

Agree0 Disagree0

I hope this is not true, he isnt the sort of player Chelsea should be looking at for the future

Agree0 Disagree0

Most over rated player in world football. I,m more likely to sign as centre forward than him. Stop wasting our time with made up bollox.

Agree0 Disagree0

Id love chelsea to sign him hes big strong and great in the air a perfect replacement for drogba

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Jul 2012 00:02:13
Ed will the players that are involved in the Olympics miss any
Premier league matches, can't afford to lose mata !!

Cheers ed, and keep up the good work

Jm10 {Ed018's Note - there will be no conflict with scheduling but fitness could be an issue. i believe if you make it to the finals players will possibly have played 6 or 7 matches in 3 weeks}

Believable2 Unbelievable2

Who would be your ideal signings this summer ED018? {Ed018's Note - Hulk, Jovetic, Azpilicueta. And maybe Cavani}

Agree0 Disagree0

In other words then mata is going to be playing 6 or 7 games at the olympics

curt

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Jul 2012 23:22:53
To any of the EDs, do Chelsea have any intest in Iker Muniain? Cheers {Ed018's Note - not at the present time}

Believable2 Unbelievable2

03 Jul 2012 22:26:39
Looks like the Cavani to Chelsea rumor is looking very likely, Sky have just put him 6/4 fave to join Chelsea this summer, hope he joins before the US tour. Someone told me who has a relative who works for the ground staff at Stamford Bridge that Didier Drogba is the man who persuaded Cavani to join Chelsea and were seen having a friendly chat after the Champs League game.

Believable9 Unbelievable4

My aunt's neighbour's sister-in-law whose cousin works at Stamford Bridge as a tea lady overheard the same conversation.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hes been 6/4 for the last month. means nothing. ma u were favorites 4 hazzard look how that turned out

Agree0 Disagree0

Wasnt a conversation, it came from one of the players telling some of the staff what was going off before the team left for their holidays. Drogba was leaving the club anyway and said he wanted Cavani to replace him. Big mistake if Chelsea let him slip from their grasp, Barca wouldnt hesitate to buy him and neither would Man City. Hulk is a disaster waiting to happen, bad temperament, part owned by some other person/club/business, has all the warning signs of another Tevez. {Ed021's Note -

Agree0 Disagree0