Chelsea Banter Archive October 29 2010
Use our rumours form to send us chelsea transfer rumours.
29 Oct 2010 18:10:02
Ok roman has said the club is a self sufficent club yes they don't mean he may give chelsea a player like he did with schevchenko he nows in order for chelsea to be succesful he has to buy players which will be able to replace the great platers they have now i.e lampard and drogba anelka, are u forgetting the man has 11 billion pound in his account and won't see chelsea be second best to the likes of srsenal and man utd, If chelsea do not sign neymar they may have another tapping up case against them so they will pay the excess required to purchase neymar, The person who is constantly bringing up romans riches why don't u just worry about your own team and squad ?
Believable0
Unbelievable0
29 Oct 2010 17:26:12
Chelsea have done an excellent job of bringing through a number of younger players. There will need to be a balancing between experience and youth, but I would suggest that the club are pretty well placed at present.
Sharkey.
I agree Sharks, Chelsea do have some decent youth and i do not doubt there will still be one 10-15m buy once a season, but there are far too many people on this Chelsea website which think Chelsea are going to buy Neymar, Ganso & Lukaku, Neymar has a buy out clause of 37m, Ganso's is 50m and Lukaku will sell for more than 20m, so this is why i believe Chelsea fans need to be realistic because they will not happen. Even you were way off in the summer when you predicted two 20m buys and a monster deal, possibly Torres, it never happened and it never will, Roman has made it clear that the club is now a self sufficient club. I cannot believe why they are ignoring him. Hes not a liar.
Whatever you say about these financial regulations Roman is going to abide by these rules, all of the top teams are going to abide by these rules. Don't think for one second that this breakaway league will ever happen because it wont. Clubs will not breakaway just because one club has spent more than it should have. That is that clubs problem not everyone else's problem.
Barcelona & Real Madrid will be fine, so will United, Arsenal, Liverpool, Spurs. City will struggle and will have to let some players go, Chelsea will break even but will not generate enough to buy top players, or pay for their wages which is why Roman & Buck are trying to get a cap in place, clearly they are worried as United can still offer huge contracts and they will not be able too. The fact that Roman is trying to sell Stamford Bridge's naming rights proves he is worried but is trying his best to break even.
Why ain't you worried Sharks?
Believable0
Unbelievable0
29 Oct 2010 16:21:45
Does this a club can only spend what it earns for every club in the world then? so surely then this will count for man city aswell and for manchester united
29 Oct 2010 16:20:35
Okay chelsea are a poor club and have no money to spend on players, are u happy now will u sleep better at night mr abramovic's pa
29 Oct 2010 16:20:04
Bastian schweinsteiger has 8 months left on his contract and cannot agree on a new and will be available on a bosman deal in the summer expect chelsea to be top runners for his signature
{Editor's note - His contract runs out in the summer of 2012}
LOL Editor, a certain paper made a right blunder, yesterday it printed a whole story that Chelsea are chasing Schweinsteiger and trying to tie him down this week as his contract runs out in the summer.
The dizzy prat got it all wrong as he is out of contract in the summer 2012, so his whole article was made up, what a plum.
Believable0
Unbelievable0
29 Oct 2010 15:51:48
Bastian schweinsteiger has 8 months left on his contract and cannot agree on a new and will be available on a bosman deal in the summer expect chelsea to be top runners for his signature
{Editor's note - His contract runs out in the summer of 2012}
Believable0
Unbelievable0
29 Oct 2010 15:27:50
"Chelsea made a £185.6m turnover this year but a £47m loss, £142m is wages alone, even after Ballack, J.Cole, Beletti, Carvalho & Deco left. This is why Chelsea will no longer be able to pay 30m for a player, we cannot afford it. Neymar is priced out of our range and so is Lakuku."
You should look again at the Chelsea annual return. The charges include significant one off payments that were made in respect of departing managers. You are painting a rather too bleak picture. Sharkey.
Sharkz if Chelsea are running like a dream then why is Roman trying to sell our stadiums naming rights?
Believable0
Unbelievable0
29 Oct 2010 14:56:14
Unless you can get Neymar for less than 20m you will not get him. WHY? Because you cannot afford him. {ed's note - didn't Chelsea just pay 25m for Ramires?}
NO! Ramires cost 16m and is on just 1m a year salary. So his overall transfer cost 17m (16m fee plus first years salary)
Why did you think he cost 25m? Where did you here that?
{Editor's note - I do not know where he heard that from}
Ha ha i know, i was a bit confused too, 'Chelseafc.com' said it was a 17m deal. 16m fee plus 1 years salary.
Ed where's the original Editor? The one i was speaking too in may who knew what he was talking about? Is that you? The one run all of this on his own?
{Editor's note - There is more than 3 Ed's who cover all the sites. The main ed who started all this up is not on atm}
Believable0
Unbelievable0
29 Oct 2010 14:42:47
Unless you can get Neymar for less than 20m you will not get him. WHY? Because you cannot afford him. {ed's note - didn't Chelsea just pay 25m for Ramires?}
NO! Ramires cost 16m and is on just 1m a year salary. So his overall transfer cost 17m (16m fee plus first years salary)
Why did you think he cost 25m? Where did you here that?
{Editor's note - I do not know where he heard that from}
Believable0
Unbelievable0
29 Oct 2010 01:23:47
Who is this guy who keeps going on about chelsea's finances please show me quotes where it had said there no will no big summer moves,
29 Oct 2010 01:20:59
Okay and your the clubs secatery are you? how do u now what is going on behing closed doors just stick to your own team geezer
Believable0
Unbelievable0