Chelsea Banter Archive February 24 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us chelsea transfer rumours.


24 Feb 2014 21:35:22
Hi ed couple of questions when you have time
Can you explain if u no the reason why lukaku is going to be sold
Do you think monaco would be willing to let falcao go if we put a decent offer in
Thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - (1) It is of no relevance. (2) We will see.}

24 Feb 2014 19:16:56
ED02 What is your job title and what would you like it to be?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - My job title is Rodeo Clown. I am also a part time Gentleman Adventurer and hope to take that up full time.}

Ed002 gentlemen adventurer sounds interesting does it involve lube?

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 17:35:14
we only need 3 players. Ricardo Rodríguez, costa or cavani and imbula, forget about shaw, he cost to much, Ricardo Rodríguez better option for me

Believable0 Unbelievable0

There's not much English potential about so we need Shaw IMO. The prices being talked about in gossip are always wrong. Matic was quoted around 40 million mark and we got him for 21 even though he's quality and is probably worth 40 mill.

Agree0 Disagree0

Shaw is a must! He is English, a chelsea fan and a brilliant left back. He has already been established in the prem and money is not an issue here because: 1) his wages wouldn't be astronomical. 2) He will be at the club for potentially 15 years so would pay off every penny of the transfer fee no matter how much it is.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Feb 2014 12:20:18
Hi Ed002,

I have read that Arsenal make in the region of £26 Million a Season more than Chelsea and Manchester United £41 Million a Season more than Chelsea through Matchday Revenue, the bulk of which comes from Ticket Sales.

Do Chelsea have any further plans in the pipeline to either expand Stamford Bridge (very costly & difficult) or to relocate (unpopular & awkward with the CPO situation).

I think most Chelsea Supporters would prefer to remain at the Bridge & are proud of it's History but the only thing that really matters is the Club and it's long term future and Financialy I think it will become unviable.

Other clubs will likely be expanding or moving onto Bigger sites in the future (Man City, West Ham & Tottenham) although there are favourable circumstances behind these plans, pushing us even further down the pecking order.

In the era of Premier League & UEFA FFP surely a larger capacity Stadium should be a top priority.

Thanking You in advance & keep up the stellar work.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - There is little option of extending SB too much. Outside options are still being considered. Chelsea earn vastly more than the likes of Spurs and WHU - I wouldn't worry about the money.}

Thank You for Your swift reply Ed002. I understand Chelsea are a far more profitable club than most across Europe but We could obviously be even better off with a larger match day revenue.

Which leads Me onto ask if Chelsea have any plans for alternative revenu streams such as Stadium Sponsorship in the near future?

Thanks again.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - If the club were to move from Stamford Bridge I would think there would be a good chance of a sponsored stadium name.}

24 Feb 2014 08:19:29
Hey ed, is the plan to have ivanovic and azpilicueta as full backs next year, with shaw as backup or azpi, or will on of betrand / van anholt be at the bridge?

Cheers

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I have no idea, sorry.}

24 Feb 2014 08:16:34
Hey ed . You asked if I could remind you next week

An you name the lists for both Monaco and Psg? Thanks man

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - End of the week will be better - I am travelling until then.}

24 Feb 2014 21:49:20
Cheers Sir

Agree0 Disagree0