Chelsea Banter Archive June 18 2011

 

Use our rumours form to send us chelsea transfer rumours.


18 Jun 2011 18:33:08
can i just point out that ron gourlay stated last week, that drogba would not be leaving stamford bridge this summer, so talk of a drogba + cash deal for modric can be ruled out. although kalou or anelka could be used as a makeweight

Believable1 Unbelievable8

18 Jun 2011 12:52:22
Modric not coming to Chelsea, we may get Emile Heskey to partner Torres up front and perhaps Glenn Whelan

Believable2 Unbelievable8

"we" may get? I doubt that you support Chelsea...

Agree6 Disagree0

Go awaay

Agree6 Disagree1

18 Jun 2011 11:19:18
how long do u thnk it will take fur the discussusions it will take until lakuka will take {Ed002's Note - No idea.}

Believable0 Unbelievable4

Forever knowing chelsea

Agree0 Disagree4

It takes "forever" for Chelsea because unlike Citeh and Real, we actually haggle instead of automatically paying the ridiculously high prices that the selling team initially demands.

Agree3 Disagree1

18 Jun 2011 08:11:25
If you want rid of Lampard then PLEASE send him up to Rangers on loan

Believable5 Unbelievable9

U can have him for nothing, hes terrible!

Agree5 Disagree3

Very short memory

Agree0 Disagree4

18 Jun 2011 06:24:47
You have to give Chelsea's staff some credit. They placed a bid they knew tottenham wouldn't accept however by making this bid publicly. Luka modric has since came out and declared his interest to leave. That isn't the first time as they also did it with Torres in the January transfer window and then he eventually placed a transfer request allowing us to bring him in. You can argue some of their decisions but I find this tactic to be very clever.

Believable7 Unbelievable5

I agree !

Agree4 Disagree5

We need to do the same with nasri

Agree1 Disagree4

18 Jun 2011 01:09:19
Neymar has not signed for Real Madrid ED001 {Ed001's Note - cheers.}

Believable5 Unbelievable0

Let em have him anyway, so much attention and fuss over somebody who's never played in prem b4.

Agree1 Disagree5

"...so much attention and fuss over somebody who's never played in prem b4."

I have to laugh at such ignorant comments like that.

People seem to forget that a lot of players have never played in the Prem. before and succeed rather nicely. There's a big chance that players like these will come back and burn you badly.

Agree3 Disagree0

''Let em have him anyway, so much attention and fuss over somebody who's never played in prem b4.'' - Messi has never played in the prem before...

Agree0 Disagree3

18 Jun 2011 00:52:47
1st of all fantastic site, this is my questions is there a possibility of us getting both Neymar and Aguero, if not which are we more likely to get pls. a specific answer will be mostly appreciated rather than a vague one thanks. am confused y did you ignore my question the 1st time i asked it. {Ed001's Note - Aguero interest was dropped after hearing his wage demands in January, I would be very surprised if interest was ever revived. Hasn't Neymar signed for Madrid?}

Believable1 Unbelievable8

Ed01, don't confuse people. Neymar hasn't signed for Madrid. All that's gonna do is cause Ed02 to have to answer more silly questions {Ed001's Note - why? Because I asked if he had signed for Madrid? Or did you just not bother to read what I said?}

Agree7 Disagree1

I read it very clearly. But there is clearly some people on here who don't comprehend very well. {Ed001's Note - nothing I can do about that, you can lead a horse and all that.}

Agree6 Disagree0

Since you are Ed001 does that mean you were the first {Ed001's Note - I was the one who started the original site, so yes I was the first one. Just shows that coming first is not always best!}

Agree1 Disagree5

How could I become an editor then. I feel like I have decent sources. I do my research on Chelsea and feel like I know what's rubbish and what's logical {Ed001's Note - email me through the contact form and I will speak to you about it tomorrow. It is too late to sort anything out now, well late here anyway!}

Agree0 Disagree6