27 Nov 2019 19:51:01
Hi All.
New member. Been reading for a few years now.
Genuine question.

Is Pulisic more important to chelsea now than hazard was.

And secondly would you swap hazard for pulisic right now?

This is the most harmonious chelsea team I've seen in a few years and for me it was hazard that was the bad egg.

1.) 27 Nov 2019
27 Nov 2019 20:16:29
Eden was fantastic for us but that ship has sailed.
Long live Pusilic!

2.) 27 Nov 2019
27 Nov 2019 22:54:34
I never really took to hazard good player but not a great player lazy in defence good dribbler but didn't score enough and it was about him not the team and downed tools more than once
I said to my mate at beginning of season pulisic is a brilliant team player and will score more goals than hazard for us.

3.) 28 Nov 2019
28 Nov 2019 00:15:26
He does the business. Like the way lamps used him sparingly. That's good man management. I maybe biased but I really like Frank's style.

4.) 28 Nov 2019
28 Nov 2019 06:10:08
Hazard was a luxury player defensively that was tough to set up a defensive system around (it’s easier when such players are central) . That said he was our attack in its entirety for large parts of last year to the point that our team would just stand around and hope he performed magic. I’ve been extremely pleased in how the entire squad has taken a bigger role this year in creating and finishing chances. Between the two it’s pulisic and it’s not close just from the standpoint of age and he won’t age well with his dependence on explosive movements and his lack of work ethic which leads to massive weight gains. 100+ from real was a joke.