Chelsea Banter Archive November 28 2010

28 Nov 2010 22:52:54

"From what i've seen a from a neutral is that carlo ancelotti has never been a manager that goes out and spends he had funds at Ac he only really bought kaka this was when he was young and bought him the system, he also bought pato also a young prospect who didn't cost much he always insisted that his team didn't need new players, i think if chelsea had mourinho or any other manager in charge they would be more positive in the transfer market and try to improve the squad"

~This is why Carlo was brought in, he has won the Champions League without investing heavily, it was not his choice not to buy players, control freaks like Roman is controlling him and the team, Berlusconi controlled him and the AC Milan team. Carlo is no more than a puppet on a string being controlled by Roman.

Roman expects Carlo to win things with the squad he has inherited, basically on a shoestring budget. This is why he was brought in. Managers like Jose need money to succeed. Carlo is a good manager with little to spend.

You are kind of missing the point guys, its Roman who does not want to invest, not Carlo.

Ed is this why Carlo was brought in?

{Editor's Note: I see your keyboard has been fixed.}

28 Nov 2010 22:30:50

ha ok go back to your man s* tty page mate, who knows what the future holds, every has thier OPINION

28 Nov 2010 22:18:28

Or why not move for ribery? hes out of favour at bayern

28 Nov 2010 22:06:32

All you so called chelsea fans who don't know who carlos edvardo is, and for frank lampard for kaka, you must be joking, bad result today , better change the manager, tea lady, the man that selles the pies, or dig deep in the pocket and buy the premiership AGAIN

28 Nov 2010 22:04:35

Hey Ed, if Xabi Alonso has to make way for Bastian Schweinsteiger if he is to move to Real Madrid, do you think Chelsea will make a move for the out of favour midfielder? {ed's note - no I don't think Chelsea would move for him, but I do think he will be the one to make way if Schweinsteiger joins Madrid.}

28 Nov 2010 20:21:11

Well why is carlo saying we don't need anymore players, he is quoted saying it today if he carries on he gonna be shown the door, WE NEED QUALITY SIGNINGS 2 OR 3 OF THEM AND IF ROMAN DOESNT THINK WE DO HE NEEDS TO FIND BUYERS THAT WILL INVEST IN THE TEAM AS THERE IS NO POINT

28 Nov 2010 20:17:37

Happy red u just calm down, we have been top since week one, dont get to happy KID, go back to your site and back to your FICKLE FANS !

28 Nov 2010 19:40:53

Is carlo ancelotti dumb? ? he doesn't need to sign in january if he carries on this will cost him his job, , , , , , , , , we are crying out for another creative midfielder why can't he seee that! ! u can't win the league with 11 quality players, ,

WHY DO WE PLAY MIKEL WEEK IN WEEK OUT HE IS APPAULING FOR GOD SAKE

28 Nov 2010 18:08:01

Hey Ed, can you explain this whole Chelsea selling their naming rights dilemma.

{Editor's Note: The naming rights to the stadium are available at the right price.}

28 Nov 2010 15:43:24

Hey Ed, is there any more problems in the "back room" at Chelsea because things are not looking good as we had another bad result today although we did not lose. Also there are rumours that Carlo is ready to quit Chelsea at the end of the season with Abramovich lining up Pep Guardiola to replace him.

{Editor's Note: I am sure everything will be OK - clearly recent results have not gone the way of Chelsea. Some of this can be blamed on Essian's dreadful tackle for which he rightly got sent off, and John Terry not being fit. However, they are simply excuses. Just one of those things - Chelsea will be there or thereabouts at the end of the season.}

28 Nov 2010 00:28:39
Unsigned at 27 Nov 2010 23:40:16:

"SHARKEY, I AM NOT SUGGESTING FOR ONE MOMENT THAT I AM INTELLIGENT AND YOU ARE NOT INTELLIGENT AS CLEARLY YOU ARE AN INTELLIGENT PERSON, I MEANT THE INTELLIGENT GUYS THAT I KNOW, WELL GUYS AND ONE YOUNG LADY. I GET MUCH OF MY INFORMATION THROUGH THEM, DON'T GET ME WRONG THEY DO NOT TELL THE WORLD WHAT THEY TALK ABOUT BUT IT CERTAINLY CONCERNS THEM.

I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT BUT SOMETIMES I GET THE FEELING YOU THINK EVERYTHING IS OKAY ALL OF THE TIME, THAT WE ARE NOT DESPERATELY TYING TO FIND SPONSORS, THAT WE ARE NOT TRYING TO DRASTICALLY REDUCE OUR WAGE BILL. IF YOU SAY YOU DO KNOW STUFF THEN HOW COME YOU DO NOT SHARE THE SAME CONCERNS AS MANY "INFORMED" CHELSEA FANS?

I GUESS WE WILL HAVE TO AGREE TO DISAGREE, BUT I WANT TO CONFIRM AGAIN THAT I WAS NOT CALLING YOU A FOOL OR SAYING YOU WERE NOT INTELLIGENT."

The problem is the scaremongering. You started this thread by naming seven members of staff supposedly sacked by the owner. This is out and out scaremongering - nothing less. After I explained that you were simply wrong in all of that, you moved on to the ill founded views of your paranoid omnipotent super friends.

All clubs are seeking sponsorship by the way - it is the nature of the business and not a secret sign to the downfall of Chelsea.

Sharkey.