Chelsea Banter Archive January 23 2012
Use our rumours form to send us chelsea transfer rumours.
23 Jan 2012 22:04:58
Willian decent enough, would certainly give us more attacking flair but obviously we all would rather Hazard (unlikely as im sure the kid will eventually end up in Spain).
Im happy with Sturridge on the right but Mata should be in the centre playing behind the striker, so that leaves a space free for a geniune tricky speedy winger (Not replacing Robben was our biggest mistake in my opinion)
Ideal team: Cech
Ivan Cahill Terry Cole
Luiz
Ramires
Mata
Sturridge Torres/Drogba Hazard
Thats eefectively a front 4 that would cause chaos in my opinion
Tebby
Believable7
Unbelievable1
23 Jan 2012 20:48:25
Ahhh, damn it. You've upset ED. Again.
Women these days. So temperamental.
Believable15
Unbelievable1
Sorry, forgot to sign my name off this post.
That was really rude of me not to do so. Forgive me ED002...
Samir
Agree3
Disagree1
23 Jan 2012 20:21:20
why does avb say hes not intersted in players that have played in the cl ,if we dont sort it out soon we wont finish in the top 4
Believable3
Unbelievable2
Kidology
Agree2
Disagree0
Never believe AVB in press confrence.
Agree2
Disagree1
23 Jan 2012 18:25:31
I would personally prefer to believe Ed002 over Sky Sports News, as s/he seems to be a lot more knowledgeable. Sky Sports News just report any piece of information they receive from virtually any Tom, Dick and 'Arry. This goes for all those unreliable football websites also, e.g. Caughtoffside.
Believable2
Unbelievable0
You make me laugh people. You trust blindly an unknown Editor (don't mean any disrespect Ed) over a well known media institution like Sky? This shows how easily lead people are. At least Sky reveal the their sources no matter how unreliable they are. {Ed002's Note - No problem for me. See you in February.}
Agree1
Disagree3
"At least Sky reveal the their sources no matter how unreliable they are" - are you being serious?! Sky do not disclose their sources the majority of the time....minly due to them surfing the web or believing twitter rumours.
Agree2
Disagree0
To the second poster.You are obviously new to the site because if you were not, you would know to listen to the Ed. {Ed002's Note - It is a regular.}
Agree1
Disagree0
How do you know he is a regular, is it the ip address {Ed002's Note - Yes. Or do you think it is his evil sister being a cretin?}
Agree1
Disagree0
23 Jan 2012 18:25:08
Perhaps 1 of the eds could confirm this but im pretty sure Chelsea have a policy not to comment on transfers. Which would mean clubs could use our name to drum up interest in a player knowing we wouldnt deny it. ie shaktar with Willian
CT13 {Ed002's Note - Shakhtar are not drumming up interest. I explained what has happened and seemingly someone has misinterpreted a translation or whatever and come up with a story for today.}
Believable1
Unbelievable0
23 Jan 2012 17:42:20
we need just 2 players this january to go with cahill:
van der wiel and de bruyne
in the summer though:
in: neymar, modric, rodwell and barkley
out: mceachran and barkley-loan
benayoun, bertrand, kalou, maybe mikel
Believable0
Unbelievable12
Why Bertrand??
SHED END
Agree8
Disagree0
Hmmm i think we need GK,LB,RB, CAM, LW, RW, and a ST, and a new board with people who aint american and aint a yid
Agree0
Disagree3
23 Jan 2012 17:35:59
It's really frustrating chelsea need sighnings but are not willing to get any to acheive anything!
Believable3
Unbelievable12
23 Jan 2012 16:56:53
23 Jan 2012 16:23:37 just appeared on Leedsforum ed u heard any thing about this rumour
Word has it ken bates and roman abramovic are having meetings about a possible swap deal involving Chelsea and Leeds as abramovic is sick of the attitudes of the Chelsea players and wants a new challenge in football however the deal has hit a stumbling block has roman is wanting 100 million pounds from bates as part of the deal {Ed020's Note - sounds crazy, and too good to be true. bit of common sense says its not true. but we can hope}
Believable1
Unbelievable3
I heard this rumour this morning but thought it had no legs however Kb was at the Norwich game on Saturday but thought it must of been to do with Howsons move to norwich
Agree0
Disagree3
Sorry i don't really understand this aspect of the game but can someone help as to why it would be beneficial for us to have Ken Bates back? {Ed002's Note - Just ignore it.}
Agree2
Disagree0
Cos I am a Leeds fan and he is content on destroying are club u can have him back I think 99% of Leeds fan would {Ed002's Note - I always liked Ken Bates when I would see him regularly back in the day - but I understand that Ed001 is not so keen.}
Agree0
Disagree2
Who invited ed20? Lol
Agree0
Disagree0
23 Jan 2012 10:01:34
altho we are ONLY norwich, you were lucky we didnt do the double over you on sat. we got a point because we were miles better than you in the 1st half, and you only played in the last 20 mins. even terry didnt score! your team no longer scares others, and now you have to work it comes hard. to be fair avb seems tactically inept and inflexible, its 4-3-3 or nothing. what is he trying to do there? i HONESTLY cannot see you min the top 4. im not gonna mention that torres cost more than our whole squad! yours, ONLY a norwich supporter, at the match.
Believable3
Unbelievable5
Haha behave yourself, get back to your paper round ya toby
SHED END
Agree6
Disagree0
Do the double it was 3-1 at our place to us you idiot
Agree6
Disagree0
Jog on
Agree5
Disagree0
Nope im not an idiot. at your place the score could easily have been 5-3 to us. we should have had a minimum of a draw. i STRONGLY suggest you watch it again and also listen to the pundits {ex pros who know more than us} even your fans going back to norwich etc said u were lucky, THEN come back with your childish comments. im a grown man but suggest you get your nappy changed shed end.
Agree0
Disagree5
I love how a Norwich fan gets all high and mighty after a 0-0 with us, wow. I'd understand if u played like Swansea and played teams(arsenal) off the park but your a cheap man's stoke. Good luck with the rest of the season, I think u might need it ;)
Agree3
Disagree0
Haha you are backing match of the day pundits!?!? These are the same people that continuously jump on the latest band wagon from one week to the next! Match of the day is responsible for everyone slagging off referees week in and week out, saying that a two footed challenge should be a red, then next week they would say "back in the day, that would have been a perfectly good challenge" How is a referee supposed to win in that situation?! As a referee you are either ruining the physical aspect of the game, or you are risking serious injuries.
Another example would be the continuous slagging off of Torres! I was watching the Wolves vs Chelsea game a couple of weeks ago, and the commentators contiously said how great Torres looked. Wolves then equilised and then the commentator said yet again Torres has misfired and he doesn't suit Chelsea's play. Then Torres set up lampards goal and they started praising him again!
Seriously, don't base your arguments on ex pundits.. please.. They just say what the current topic is..
Agree2
Disagree0
Jog on pal before i let the tyres down on your combine harvester
SHED END
Agree5
Disagree0
You are NOT a football fan. If you were, you would understand the game a tad better than you have illustrated through your bizarre posts!
Chelsea won 3-1 at home - so NO double there matey.
Secondly, you will learn this the hard way, you don't get results on what you 'deserve' it's all about putting the ball in the net.
So get ready for Championship next season son.
BigMike
CFC.4.life
Agree4
Disagree0
So how come Torres is still here then.
Agree2
Disagree1